M5S: doubts on new rules and Nuti the irony of a ‘us out of whatever’/Ap (3) – Metro

(AdnKronos) – “This seems to be a ‘law that is the same for all’? he writes, among others, an activist – depending On the case… depending On the severity… The guarantor and the arbitrators will make their assessments in total autonomy… to Decide whether… Decide how to… Decide… But what the fuck are you saying? The laws and regulations should be equal and clear for all, unequivocally! No one can decide in free autonomy depending on the severity of the case, the humour or air that pulls. But you are out of your mind?”.

And there are those who asked that the Network be involved in the decisions on warnings, warranty and legal proceedings. “I believe, writes a militant – that the code should also provide for the voting on the network for all cases in the public domain, and that the decision made via the network is unquestionable. Otherwise, you move away from direct democracy”. “Ok, arbitrators and the guarantor, but where’s the direct democracy (consultation of members)?”, is echoed by another activist.

Criticism on the Network, even on the point five, which provides for the obligation, to elect, to inform the operator of the site, the existence of any criminal proceedings. Therefore, the firm Casaleggio associati. “The obligation to inform the manager of the site? – writes Daniela C. – Maaa daiii, guys! But we want to make people laugh behind?”. “Whoever is elected, and then the figure is constitutionally public, cannot and must not respond politically to a Private company that responds to a different Code,” notes the dose another activist.