Reforms, in the Chamber’s appeal Chiti: “Less amendments, voting to … – Reuters

Reforms, in the Chamber's appeal Chiti: "Less amendments, voting to … – Reuters

The proposal of the leader of the dissidents of the Democratic Party in the House today:” Idea shared with senators who support the majority. ” But M5S opposes “Do not retire any of our amendments.” Forza Italian replies, “We have not yet erodes the covenant of the Nazarene.” Ncd: “Yes, but only with a broad consensus.” The League: “First we want guarantees from the government,”

Grouping amendments to the bill on reforms around a few themes qualifying, with only “a few dozen” of proposals for amendments. Discuss and vote on them in plenary during the period between now and the summer break and then postpone the explanations of vote and the final vote on the bill in early September. And ‘This is the appeal launched by Vannino Chiti, leader of the dissidents of the Democratic Party, in the House resumes work on the Senate bill on reform. ” It is not a new proposal,” said Chiti,” which emphasizes the sharing of this proposal with the senators who support the government majority, at least.” ” My proposal moves from a concern that the constitutional reforms do not take place in a climate so incensed by the tone, wall against wall, which is not acceptable and that misleads the reasons of one or the other.”

Reactions:

Democratic Party: “Although September is good”

” I agree”. Replicates the Democratic Party leader in the Senate, Luigi Zanda. ” I welcome the signs of respect Senator Chiti because voting terminate in any event within 8 August. This is possible, then if the explanations of vote should go in early September, I do not consider it a traumatic element.” Zanda but has’ made an appeal asking the plenary assembly” a complete and compliant statement, without which everything would become more difficult.”

M5S: “Do not retire any of the amendments”

“We do not withdraw any of the 200 amendments that we have tabled.” So M5S the leader of the Senate, Vito Petrocelli, speaking in Parliament, during the debate on the amendments to the draft bill reforms, about the mediation proposal of Senator of the Democratic Party Vannino Chiti, who asked for a reduction to the essentials of the amendments with the possibility of arrive in September for the final vote.

Forza Italy: “I scratched the Covenant of the Nazarene”

The mediation proposal launched by Vannino Chiti on the bill on reforms is welcomed by Senator Bruno Donato Forza Italy, who saw it as” a good way to calm things down,” but with a clarification ‘:” Not everything that proposes Chiti can be accepted, because the covenant of the Nazarene is a reference that we can neither scratch.”

Ncd: “Only if there is consent”

The new center welcomes the mediation on the bill on reforms Chiti, but only with the commitment that all will contribute”” ‘why’ this proposal makes sense if there is a broad consensus.” And ‘as pointed out in Parliament the leader, Maurizio Sacconi. For the rest, he said” we are open to what will achieve the goal of making early and do well” on land reform.

League: “We want guarantees from the Government”

” They are weeks that we have placed on the table of the government our proposals on the content , to which the executive has not given answers. We are at a crossroads? Well, but before going in a direction we want serious answers and concrete by the government or goodbye and thank you, I cancel the holiday and I do not go on vacation. There is no ‘right to claim victory by Renzi.” It is the position of the Northern League in the words of Gian Marco Hundred who added:” It made me fear a passage of the intervention of Senator Bruno Forza Italian who said that the pact of the Nazarene does not scratch. We put everything on the table and then you go ahead. We want to see everything at this point, with transparency.”

If l: “We arrive at a high and free debate”

Sel does not completely close the proposed Vannino Chiti, and leave it open a crack. Provided, warns in the Senate Loredana De Petris, there is “a real debate, serious, high and free, not affected by the agreement of the Nazarene,” which, he says, “is the guest of stone.” And ironically the Parliamentary Sel: “if we were still in the hearing of the Committee I would ask Berlusconi to clarify once and for all.”

So, to reopen the comparison Sel okay, “but I need to clarify ‘the covenant of the Nazarene is the constraint or substantially all of you can discuss the merits? In essence, “the covenant have to do it all in the classroom, freely, there is a free comparison on the merits of the issues. The point – concludes De Petris – is not to have a week more or less, but that there will be a mediation high. ”