Wednesday, February 25, 2015

Grasso: “To abolish the condemned annuities do not need a law” – Quotidiano.net

Grasso: "To abolish the condemned annuities do not need a law" – Quotidiano.net

Rome, February 25, 2015 – It is up to the Chambers , in their autonomy, and not to the law to determine the provision of annuities and pensions to senators have finished their mandate and that have been convicted, with a final judgment, for serious crimes. And ‘this, in summary, the sense of Location in law assumed, according to reports in the Senate, the President Pietro Grasso in a meeting that, in agreement with the Speaker of the House, Laura Boldrini, present the same and quaestors of both Houses of Parliament, prior to the next following meeting of the quaestors just on point. For Grasso (which would receive in their own hands the opinion of the president emeritus of the Consulta Cesare Mirabelli, arrived in the Senate on February 19, just last night) would therefore be “paradoxical assume”, as does Mirabelli, “that subsequent changes should be rooted in a source different legislation from the source which formed the institute. It is a general principle of law, as well as blatant reasonableness, that the organ produces a standard is the only one who can change it “. “If the Presidential Council may consider to have no power to amend the regulations on annuities and pensions, then this would destroy the entire legislative powers on guarantees for MPs, and recognize that the law could also modify the existing rules on remuneration legal and parliamentarians, “he wrote, according to reports from parliamentary sources in the Senate, Pietro Grasso in ‘opinion against’ written by himself.

” My position on annuities to former parliamentarians is clear and known for some time: I personally unacceptable that we continue to disburse to who is guilty of serious crimes as mafia and corruption, “said the Speaker of the House, Laura Boldrini . “The decision is now – he adds – the Bureau of the Chamber and the Council of the Presidency of the Senate, which I’m sure will come as soon as possible to decide on such a delicate matter, on which there is much expectation on the part of public. “

LikeTweet

No comments:

Post a Comment