Rome, February 21, 2015 – The reform of the labor market in Italy will have an impact on GDP of + 0.9% in 2020. The percentage is contained in the document sent by the EU Commission concerning the MEF ” structural reforms in Italy from September 2014 “. The OECD estimates are even more optimistic: the Jobs Act would have an impact on GDP of + 1% in 2020. In 24 hours of approval d and decrees Jobs Act (CARD – What changes) launched yesterday by the Council of Ministers, does not turn off the echo of the measure. If the tweet of Minister P. A. Marianna Madia (“After 20 years at the flex is added security: shock absorbers, motherhood, and just CoCoCo cocopro”) and underscores ‘reformist’ the Minister of In infrastructures, Mauritius Wolves (satisfied with the “defeat of the conservative center-right and c enter-left”) keep up the volume of the bass drum of the government, the opposition to the measure found numerous critics ready to represent it ..
ALFANO: FORWARD UNTIL 2018 – “We are ready to renew our covenant with this government and with the Prime Minister and content to go on until 2018 to achieve things done yesterday “. So the Interior Minister Angelino Alfano intervening in Sestriere (Turin) to the Winter School organized by Ncd. “Renzi with us has not betrayed pacts – adds the leader of the center-right New -. We’re there for the next three years because we want them to realize some things about the contents: more freedom, more market, more work, more security. ” In the “renewed pact with the government,” Alfano wants a new law with more stringent standards to ensure safety in the city and, after the jobs act, “a family act.”
FASSINA FURIOUS – ” With this decree the Democratic Party of Renzi become the party of the strong interests . After arriving on the positions of Ichino now reached Sacconi that, at this point, can enter the Democratic Party of Renzi “. The day after the approval of the Jobs Act., The Democratic Party is more than ever in turmoil. Stefano Fassina, former Deputy Minister for Economics and member of the minority of the Democratic Party, interviewed by Republic rejects the decrees: “It is an extraordinary propaganda operation – highlights -. There remain all forms of precarious contracts. With this decree the Italian labor law back the fifties. Renzi implement the economic agenda of the Troika with a fidelity that, I am sure, Professor Monti will envy. “
‘FICO LEAF’ – Fassina lists why: “The scrapping of co.co.co there already, only remain in the public service where, for the hiring freeze, there will be no transformation. For example, everything will remain as it is now for professionals without VAT. There remain also the fixed-term contracts without causality remain intermittent work, work well, and the accessory ‘apprenticeship without stabilization requirements. The book of temporary contracts does not change. It is a fig leaf to cover the only real objective of this government on work: delete the possibility of reintegration into the workplace in the event of unjustified dismissal, ie delete Article 18 “.
PARLIAMENT BETRAYED – “The government has decided not even to acknowledge what were the recommendations contained in the opinions of the parliamentary committees” , is disconsolate Gianni Cuperlo, another exponent of miniorazna dem in controversy with Renzi. Serious matter, because the recommendations – in the Democratic Party – had been taken up by the whole party, “majority-minority”.
‘REBATES UNREPEATABLE’ – Fassina dribble so the expected success of the Prime Minister: “ The expected increase in permanent contracts there will be no thanks to the deletion of Article 18 but due to the cutting of the contributions for three years for new employees in 2015. A measure that costs a lot and that, given the conditions our public finance, will not be repeated. “
BOLDRINI ATTACKS -” There have also been also not favorable opinions by the committees of the House and Senate and perhaps it would have been appropriate keep them due consideration “, has accused the Speaker of the House Laura Boldrini .
VENDOLA ANGER -” We are at a turning point, but very, very, very negative . This is a counter. Confirmation, despite the contrary intention of the Parliament, collective redundancies, does not clarify what the useful resources to fuel social safety nets, confirming the disappearance of article 18, the right to work and disappears advancing the right to dismissal, 45 remain atypical contracts of 47, “says the leader of Sel, Nichi Vendola.
RISK SPLIT – Keep collective redundancies in the Jobs Act was” a wrong policy choice, “notes Cesare Damiano (Pd), former Minister of Labour and Chairman of the Committee on Labor of the House. “On collective redundancies – explains the Corriere della Sera is likely to open up a dispute now before the courts. In fact, the collective will emerge in a clear manner the structural division between old and new employees that runs through the Jobs Act. In the case of collective redundancies illegitimate, the judge should order the reinstatement in the job of those who were hired prior to the reform while those taken with the contract in protections increasing the financial compensation would be enough. “
CELEBRATING CONFINDUSTRIA – A Stephen Lamb, vice president of Confindustria with responsibility on industrial relations, the appetite comes with eating : “It is important that the contract at increasing protections be extended to everyone, even to old assumptions. It is a condition essential if you want to attract foreign investment. “
BARBAGALLO CAUSTIC – The general secretary of Uil, Carmelo Barbagallo, is very critical “They said they would remove all contracts of insecurity, when in fact they have added new ones, such as the possibility of extending the use of vouchers. They were to extend the protections and even that they did. Even with tax relief for permanent contracts you had to predict stakes in such a way that in the face of three years of contributions were then secured another three years of occupation. But even here nothing. And if a business owner wants to be clever as you protect? “ It predicts tough times for the cheering Confindustria , who” does not know what to expect “because now “all the rules on the protection that we have got from the government will try to put them into contracts.”
No comments:
Post a Comment