Saturday, May 16, 2015

The CGIL wrote to Mr La Spezia: “Reviewing the reform of … – Citta della Spezia

                          La Spezia – “Dear Ladies

it is quite clear, from the great mobilization emerged following the presentation of the bill called the Good School, which at this time is more necessary than ever to open themselves to comparison to try to reach a solution for reform of public schools shared and able to respond to the many existing problems. The public school needs more targeted investment, not possible to think that a reform so vital to the future of our country will take the form of charge.

In contrast, with the budget law, the government cut 2,020 units teaching staff, while the Document of Economics and Finance provides a further reduction in expenditures in education in the coming years, although Italy is already near the bottom among OECD countries as a percentage of GDP used for education. Continues a policy of linear cuts symptom of poor attention to the world of knowledge. For the first time in the history of the Republic, to schools has not yet come to a euro operation and we are near the end of the year.
To compensate for the lack of resources parents and businesses may donate directly to a contribution school reference. Do you think this could be the solution? What will happen is that the high school in the center of Milan and Secondary School in the suburbs will benefit from a number of different resources, because they are different economic conditions of families or because in reality some companies have no interest in investing. This way you will create beautiful and innovative schools for the rich and crumbling schools for others. Our Constitution says anything: to remove barriers to greater investment should be reserved for the most disadvantaged reality. No investment by the Government, is aimed at combating the phenomenon of early school leaving, the theme that should have been a priority, considering that our country continues to have a level of education rather low even compared to the percentage of kids who get to the diploma and a degree.

According to the DDL school leaders will call in service teachers who prefer drawing from the register territory, regardless of the score achieved in the ranking. This will hardly be assumed that the teacher precarious in the fourth month of pregnancy, the parent of a disabled boy, or the professor suffering from some disease, although more experienced colleagues and score. A point contrary to the constitutional principles that guarantee objective criteria for recruitment in the public sector and we are confident that open to a significant and uncontrolled amount of legal briefs. It’s not unthinkable that to circumvent the rulings of the European Court to the precarious one can not reiterate the contract over 35 months of service. It is necessary to provide a long-term plan of recruitment that guarantees the right to the stabilization to all qualified temporary workers and those who are doing service in the school for years.

Absolutely priority is also to renew the national collective agreement expired in 2009, instrument necessary to ensure the right to training and look for new organizational forms that better meet the needs of our children.
For all these points, it is necessary that the government take a step back and that, in the light of the above problems exposed, you should review the entire system of reform, without sacrificing the assumptions provided for in the bill that they can not become a form of blackmail to approve also the harmful and counterproductive.

You need to be reopened a true and thorough debate in schools and that the results be brought to a subsequent discussion in Parliament. Public education for our country has a role too important and strategic because it hastily approve measures that are likely to grow dissent and prove counterproductive. ”
                     

LikeTweet

No comments:

Post a Comment