Matteo Renzi proposes formally to the direction of the Pd to modify the Italicum to bring the whole party to vote Yes in the referendum 4
December: “The commitment is to enroll in the parliamentary committees in the two weeks immediately following the popular consultation. Then the premier-the secretary indicates the points of the Italicum on which it is willing to deal with: the mode of election of members of the new Senate, the ballot, the electoral colleges and the award of the majority. Pretty much everything. And announces the birth of a commission within the party with the personality of both the fronts to study the dossier, which also confronting with other political forces, in view of its new landing in the Parliament. And thinking about the referendum, warns: “for 18 years we ask ourselves who has killed the Olive tree, I would spend the next 18 years to question those who have decided to close the perspective of the Pd”. In the debate different to check out is, emphasize the positions changing in the minority on the Italicum to demonstrate how the claims of the law are instrumental to to to block the referendum and to bring down the government. But the response of the opposition party, the interior is ice-cold. Cuperlo is asking for a proposal of the Pd on the Italicum ahead of the referendum and announces his No if before the vote, we will not reach an agreement: “If I am forced to vote No to leave the Parliament.” And if Bersani does not take the word, Roberto Hope rejects the proposal of the secretary: “You want to make a committee? Good, but need an initiative on Pd and a government push. Today’s proposal is not enough”. In the end the board approves the report of the U, but the minority do not vote. And the clash on the “conjunction”, the term used on a recurring basis from the check out is with the intention of mocking vis-à-vis the minority, referendum, and Italicum is intended to follow.
ALBERTO D’ARGENIO
© Reproduction reserved