Wednesday, January 27, 2016

Banks, rejected the double no confidence in the Senate – Il Sole 24 Ore

History Article

Close

This entry was posted on January 28, 2016 at 6:37.

ROME

“There is no conflict of interest in this matter, but only the choice of saving a million depositors and seven salaries . If you want to send us home to this, do it. We would never have destroyed parts of economy to make a political struggle against the government, before your party squabbles there’s interest and you have to remember. ” Matteo Renzi returns to defend the decree saving banks and the minister Maria Elena Boschi, sitting at his side in the pews of the Government in the Senate, in his reply to the debate on motions of no confidence against the entire executive presented by Forza Italy-League and the M5S the case banks. As for Banca Etruria, which the father of Woods, Pier Luigi, was vice president, the prime minister reaffirms essentially what was said by the minister during the confidence motion on his person discussed and rejected by the House before Christmas: “This government Banca Etruria has police as he did with other banks without any regard for names, because for us there are no friends or friends of friends, and the proof lies in the fact that the Bank has sanctioned the Italian family of a minister and is in fact that there was not a single event that will be talked about conflict of interests nor Woods nor other ministers of this government. “

At the end of the two motions are rejected without palpitations from the Chamber of the Senate, one of the center by 178 votes, with one of grillini 176. Widely above the threshold of majority and with the figure of no small importance that the ‘announced support to the government of Tosiani Fare and especially verdiniani Ala is not decisive. Irrelevant in short, the majority this time do it alone (see article on this page). And this can only be a source of satisfaction for the prime minister, because for once not part of the usual pressure of the minority of the Democratic Party on the danger posed by Verdini and the Party of the Nation for the identity of the Democratic Party (only on Tuesday evening has spoken former Democratic leader Pier Luigi Bersani).

“A quiet debate seems to me, no? I had prepared a speech all controversial, then I saw the debate and I said “do not do controversy, a debate has been quiet,” said the premier exchanging some evaluation with journalists as he left the Senate, where still there are explanations of vote . In fact the tone of Renzi in Parliament is much to counterattack, and no shortage of jabs at M5S Fourth on the case. “In this country who pays wrong but the judges decide, not you, after the first second and third degree of judgment … not the fourth degree, which is the blog of the Enlightened One,” he said the premier while start protests Senators grillini. “As soon as they hear the name Fourth stir,” he adds pointing to the benches of the Democratic Party. But especially in the viewfinder no Fi, a former ally of the late agreement on reform of the Nazarene. “From that pulpit,” she mentions talking to charges of conflict of interest. Then the attack: “You are divided, you are less and less. We wait patiently in the moderate camp of the center you can go back to a language that is not that of ideological opposition that, in a case like this, it takes you to do battle without realizing what was the banking system in Italy. ” The Prime Minister, as well as defending the salvabanche, strongly emphasizes the reform of cooperative banks: “This government is the only one with the reform of the banks ran for cover with measures that were taken 25 years ago. We are proud for a reform that was attempted by Ciampi and Dragons. If it had been made in the late nineties in many Italian banks, starting with the North East, we would have avoided the scenes of the past 15 years in terms of contiguity between the credit system and politics. “

In short, for Renzi controversy on banks triggered by the opposition it is “political manipulation understandable” when not “mud.” “You will go forward again to attack you at every piece of mud, get me your arguments. We go forward thinking to Italy and leave better than we found it. ” A preemptive defense against attacks that the government puts into account for the next few weeks: the rumors circulating for days found voice in the statements of Senator Sel Massimo Cervellini “Pier Luigi Boschi February 6 should be investigated.”

© ALL RIGHTS RESERVED



Permalink

LikeTweet

No comments:

Post a Comment