Sunday, January 31, 2016

Civil unions Tuesday in court, immediately ruling of unconstitutionality – The West

Next Tuesday the bill Cirinnà on civil unions arrives in parliament to face the vote of the Senate. The first test will be the holding of a majority ruling on constitutionality, with the request for referral to committee. The Cirinnà fact never went to committee (Justice), quite unique case in parliamentary history.

Then there is the pressure in recent hours invested the palace, after the request to stop the bill coming from the square on Saturday at the Circus Maximus in Rome: two million people who have demonstrated to the Family Day . Within the governing majority, centrist Catholics and the Democratic Party would only change the text, eliminating any equivalence between marriage and unions and perhaps by deleting the disputed stepchild adoption, the gay adoptions opening in the uterus rent.

The Democratic Party does not really seem willing to big changes: there can be, says the leader of the Senate Zanda, but as long as “no stravolgano text”. The same request came from 5 Star Movement, there is willingness to vote for civil unions and support the ruling majority, provided that the general structure does not change.

M5S has tabled amendments, which move reassuring at least to a certain extent the Democratic Party. So Renzi wants to play as it became the custom to the game on two tables of civil unions in the Senate, with 5 Star Movement to act as a crutch on one side and possibly the verdiniani Ala and other senators scattered across. And ‘this the most likely scenario, a lot more than a Renzi granting substantial changes at the last allies of AP and to the Catholics of his party. Forza Italy, to the mouth of Berlusconi, while allowing a free vote is against the Cirinnà. Ditto Brothers of Italy.

After meeting Alfano, yesterday the spokesman Family Day, Massimo Gandolfini turned to Renzi: “I appeal to the conscience of the Catholic premier Renzi, who I think is an intelligent person, with a great political insight. That bill is blocked. ” Gandolfini does not seem to believe, however, that there are “second thoughts on the part of politics; there is a dogged stubbornness on the part of Parliament, and equally stubborn is our stubbornness to oppose”.

In the Senate there is a united front that wants to stop the law, putting the government in front of a choice, “because, beyond the hypocrisy, this bill is openly supported by the government, to beat it you must be prepared to choose between the people of the Circus Maximus and the permanence executive “says Sen. Quagliariello (Idea).

” The institutional meetings are always a good thing, “adds Quagliariello referring to the meeting between Gandolfini and the Minister of ‘interior, “but Alfano, rather than meet Gandolfini, should meet Renzi and tell him something really easy:’ Friend, to govern you need our votes, and since we are in a coalition government, the bill Cirinnà You send him back to committee ‘. If Alfano find this courage, we all have a duty to riconoscerglielo. If it finds more than anyone in that square will remember. “

So there is a parliamentary front that it is not seeking mediation on Cirinnà, no deletions or rearrangements, but a stop sign and return committee. It ‘a request by senators as Giovanardi Mauro and the same Quagliariello: Italians must be clear that the bill on civil unions, as well as introducing in Italy and dangerous practices contrary to the rights of minor realizes yet another violence and forcing institutions by Renzi.

A little ‘as the “super-Kangaroo”, the amendment presented recently by Senator Marcucci, fer the Democratic Party, for invalidate the others if anything passed, should not go, because the Cirinnà is expected to test fire 6000 amendments , enough to trigger a parliamentary vietnam. Precious time to further strengthen the political front that referring ideals manifested in Family Day acquires legitimacy and is an alternative to renzismo.

LikeTweet

No comments:

Post a Comment