Piero Fassino and invites to clear the field of battle for a referendum by the “arguments and the improper and instrumental in dominating the debate”, explains the reasons of the ” Yes ” and opens to the award of the coalition: change the Italicum to weld an alliance between the Pd and the left government and the centre.
The No is in the lead, Yes you will have time to replace?
“We have two months of the campaign in which we strive to explain the real content of the reform. There are those, like the Brunette, asks a vote against Renzi and who asks for a vote on the electoral law. 70 years on from the adoption of the Constitution it is normal for an update of the second part.”
The storm is on “how” to upgrade the institutions, not on the “if”.
“do You pretend not to know that is not touched in the slightest the first part, where you establish the principles and values that governed the Republic. We we will focus on the innovations of the reform, in the first place the overcoming of bicameralism equal. And we will remember that in the vast majority of democratic Countries the bicameralism is founded on the differentiation of skills between the two Rooms. The model that we propose is in effect today in Germany, France and other democratic Countries”.
For justice in italy the victory of the ” Yes ” leads straight from democracy to oligarchy.
“it is Not true. Just read the articles that concern the president of the Republic and the president of the Council to see that their powers are not touched.”
Napolitano has said that Renzi has made many errors and that many will vote No because they are against the premier.
“it is Not respectful of the voters ask for a ballot for a different objective from the object of the consultation. These are not political elections”.
If he wins the No Renzi needs to resign, maybe to try a Renzi bis?
“It’s a surreal discussion. In the meantime, let’s do the referendum, then each will draw its own conclusions”.
to Change the Italicum to recompact the Pd, in the fear that will win the No?
“I do not agree with those who try to change the subject of the referendum, which is the Constitution and not the other. And then, like Renzi, I believe, a legitimate reflection on the electoral law. The runoff in a system tripolar alters the representation of the actual, in order to overcome it, or configure it differently.”
go towards the prize to the coalition?
“can You think of a prize of the coalition, in a model that does not allow the spraying and the parties coriander. Serves a minimum threshold of access in order to avoid the proliferation of endless partitini, the evil of the past”.
For Cuperlo the coalition designed by Franceschini on “the Republic” “breaks the Pd”.
“In the time in which it was asked that the prize be given to the coalition, honesty wants Cuperlo to say also to what the coalition thinks”.
center…
“the Center is a compound word from the left and centre, or am I wrong? A centre-left made by who? The Mattarellum amended the minority has as a corollary a coalition government. What the coalition have in mind?”.
Without Alfano and Verdini.
“If Alfano didn’t like very much, Verdini don’t talk about it, and anyone who is in the odor of the centre, is looked at with suspicion, which left are we talking about? An alliance between us and Sel is likely to be a minority in this Country”.
The spin-off is inevitable?
“it Would be a choice of installed capacity, the new parties do not have market”.
Today in Milan she will be on the stage of To the left for Yes, with other leaders of the former ds. It is a new trend?
“it is Not a new trend, so that in the appeal there are men and women who, in the Pd have different collocations. Someone accredits that, if you are of the left, which you can not vote No. Instead we are left and we will vote Yes“.
October 1, 2016 (change from 1 October 2016 | 22:33)
© REPRODUCTION RESERVED
No comments:
Post a Comment