History of the article
Close
This article was published on February 19, 2016 at 21:20 hours.
the last change is the 19 February 2016 at 21:37.
“It’s a hypothesis in the field.” So the president of the Senate Pietro Grasso intercepted by the reporter in the Senate responded to the question whether it is plausible that are declared inadmissible all the amendments so-called “supercanguri” presented the bill Cirinnà. Starting from the famous “super-kangaroo” dem Andrea Marcucci, that reformulating the entire text of the law would invalidate most of the other amendments. “I’m considering all assumptions and all the scenarios – added fat – could finally have a” human “file of only 1,200 amendments net of eligibility assessments.” But the proposed changes, in the end, may fall below the thousand with a range of secret votes is not very wide. You return to vote in the House Wednesday.
Fat: via kangaroos? Hypotheses in the field
Grasso explained that the amendments premissivi (ie the so-called “kangaroo”, ed), “are tolerated weapon in front exasperated obstructionism”, but now “we are facing only a few hundred votes. ” That’s why, “considering also the importance of the issue,” the inadmissibility of “kangaroos” “is a hypothesis on the pitch.” The dossier consists precisely of approximately 1,200 amendments, after thinning of practice (via the preposterous, outsiders to the field and joined together) should be reduced to about 6-700, in estimates that are made.
Woods: Pd not self-serving understood
“The laws are made if there are numbers.” To date, “the Democratic Party in the Senate is not self-sufficient, neither is if we add up the votes of Sel. So we have to create a meeting point between the forces that are there.” So the Minister Maria Elena Boschi in Bologna. Listens for Grasso decisions, the Democratic Party is currently also pledged to explore ways to work unpacking one of the “Kangaroo” Martucci, so as to isolate the theme of adoptions, leaving the decision to the House by secret ballot and therefore with freedom of conscience . The centrist there WOULD BE? “Leaving in fact choose the House on the issue of adoptions, in freedom of conscience and by secret ballot, should be there”, is the reasoning that is done in the Democratic Party. Yet the group Ncd-Ap in the Senate is almost divided in half between the trattativisti, as the leader Renato Schifani, and the vigorously opposed, as Maurizio Sacconi. Formally Angelino Alfano, invoking “a serious mediation within the majority”, insists on the dismissal of adoptions. But between now and Wednesday, when it will return to vote, there is still a long time.
Waiting for the intervention of Renzi
A clarification in this sense a lot will depend on the location you will Renzi Sunday during his speech at the Democratic Party, from which however do not expect disruptive positions, given the overriding need to keep the party united as possible, also in view of the administrative elections and immediately after the referendum on constitutional reforms in the autumn, at which the Prime Minister obviously puts maximum attention. Waiting for a ‘signal’ to Renzi, while the Democratic Party precise minority of not having made the request to the government to trust, the party appears in stalemate, with more than half of the firm senators in asking the maintenance of stepchild and a thirty Cattodem (which in this case could make axis with the centrists) instead consider the excerpt still the best solution. Excerpt but those of Ap deem inadequate. Certainly, no kangaroos, in plenary will be a battle of any amendment to Article 3 as the first central hub.
The variable M5s
In terms M5S, the cancellation of kangaroos by Grasso would give the opportunity to claim a great political success and simultaneously to quell violent protests raised by refusing to vote the amendment Marcucci. Although the Democratic Party is no longer any regard on pentastellato support for the Movement it would become still difficult to explain, especially to a part of his electorate, a headland on the merits of the bill Cirinnà. And the M5S is done it again ‘at stake’ (although contacts with the Democratic Party on the issue is now closed), after today’s Alessandro Di Battista points out how the 5 Stars put their votes “at the disposal of the law and not the Democratic Party ».
© ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
Permalink
No comments:
Post a Comment