Fat and that agreement that limits the votes secrets: so than the Charter – BBC

strategy to the palace, Madame

Milan , February 10, 2016 – 23:27

“With the referee deployed the game is over,” he sighed disconsolately Quagliariello. And another enemy of Cirinnà law, Mario Mauro, is haunting the hall of Palazzo Madama noting ruefully two numbers of the reporters on notebooks, 161 and 159. “We’re on the edge, but will win them. Article 5 with the stepchild adoption will pass, despite the contrary vote of Monti, Napolitano and 35 dem. It will go smoothly for the Democratic Party also the final vote. “

the turning

the hopes of the transverse front opposing the adoption and the rights for Gay couples have broken classroom at five in the evening. When President Pietro Grasso – after days of worries and restraint, spent poring cavillosamente the Constitution, the Civil Code, the text of Cirinnà law and the rules of the Senate – he stopped to surprise the request of the opposition, who wanted to stop the path of law. The problem for the ultras Catholics, is that the decision not to grant the secret ballot on the device devised by the League’s Calderoli square a large mortgage on the entire law. From Tuesday onwards, when it begins the battle of the amendments, it is foreseeable that Grasso grant very few votes secrets, just as desired by day by the leader of the Democratic Party, Luigi Zanda.

Article 2

Stating that the secret can not be granted because “the discipline of social formations where there is the personality of the individual”, including gay families, “finds its constitutional basis in Article 2 “and not in Article 29 of the Charter, Grasso builds a rigid frame to the next choices. It is preparing to de-mine the land by much of the bombs placed by minorities. The attacks are vehement, but he pulls straight, convinced of being right. “But how – it would be vented with her – before they remove from Cirinnà text any reference to the family and then get upset if I refer to Rule 2?.”

the tune

Wednesday several senators as they watched, for the first time, the second-highest state opts a solution for the entire policy, rather than procedural. And although ‘realpolitik’ is not the right word to signal the turn, it affects the unreleased tune with the ambitions of the Democratic Party. The agreement with dem was to be expected, given the stated belief of grease that Italy must quickly “recognize the full citizenship rights of homosexual couples.” Yet such a communion of intent has stunned the opposition. Giovanardi gave Grasso of “foolish servant of the majority” and the president responded by marking the distance from the Family Day moods: “I take it as a medal.”

The role of the Keeper

Apart in Zanda, who is in the party and with other political forces, a decisive role was played by the Justice Minister Andrea Orlando: in addition to mediate between the souls of the Democratic party in the fight last week during a break of the discussion spoke to tete with grease. And the Democratic Party there are those who underlines that, among the few to be heard dem Gras, there’s Beppe Lumia, author of several amendments mediation. But this time, ensure to the headquarters of the Democratic Party, “there was no need to put pressure on the president, because they were marching in the same direction.” After the tensions on the reforms, the Democratic Party seems to have paid an axis with the former magistrate, who could knock out the opposition. “Cuckoo, the president is no more!” Is unleashed Quagliariello. Yet not everyone is convinced that the game is really closed in favor of Renzi. It is true that the 195 to 101 of the past is a complete victory, but it is also true that the PD estimate that 170 votes of the majority of the rod: a threshold is reached indicating “twenty” the cattodem ready to rip. If they were thirty or more, that’s the bar would drop to 160. Even so explains the caution of the Democratic Party. Placing a “supercanguro” of renziano Marcucci, which erases blocks of amendments, the government otterebbe an easy victory, but at what price? The text could get out mutilated, without those changes that reduce the risk of unconstitutionality. The centrist Alfano would feel provoked and the moods of cattodem would risk explode. Keep calm then, hoping that time (and mediations) lead the ship to port.

February 10, 2016 (edited February 10, 2016 | 23:56)

© ALL RIGHTS RESERVED