Friday, February 12, 2016

civil unions, Renzi: “The secret vote does not decide the bishops” – BBC



Milan February 12, 2016-09 : 50

” the secret vote is decided by the Parliament and not the CEI. And I say this with respect for the Cardinal Bagnasco. ” In the aftermath of the stance of the president of the Italian bishops – who had called for the scope of secret voting in the Senate to ensure a true exercise of freedom of conscience on the issue of civil unions – it has been the president of the Council Matteo Renzi , to emphasize the position of the Democratic Party. He had done Thursday night “hot” also the Secretary for Relations with Parliament, Luciano Pizzetti. The intervention of the Prime Minister to Radio too reiterates the firm line of the Nazarene, who in recent days had also closed to the demands of the main ally – the Ap-Ncd Angelino Alfano – to an excerpt the bill Cirinnà the part relating to the stepchild adoption , the adoption of the natural son of the partners, and the elimination of all lexical parallelism even with marriage. The head of government has instead said “strongly opposed” to the surrogate motherhood and said he was ready to “do more to ban the surrogate not only in Italy, where it is already banned, but also in other countries” , aligning itself with the position expressed in this several times by the same Alfano. Who is held out of the controversy is the secretary of the Italian Bishops Conference, Msgr. Nunzio Galantino , which chooses not to follow Bagnasco in his appeal to Italian politics: “It is what I have already said – he cut short with the Ansa -: out of respect for Parliament and the institutions prefer not to talk ».



” rights to whom you love “

” I have always considered sacrosanct make a law on civil unions – the head of government – he said. It was a commitment that I had taken with the Italians and with Parliament. We finally, after years of delay. ” And again: “On civil unions, the country is clearly deployed. But that fear can make two people who love each other? Why not give them rights? “. In the Senate, however, the deployment will not be so clear, especially after the M5S left freedom of conscience to its representatives, and after about thirty of the Democratic senators said it was ready to vote in disagreement with his group on theme of adoptions. The fear is that the cross-majority they rely on the supporters of the law can not be effected, and that eventually the secret ballot can foster taken away and become also an opportunity for yields of political accounts not necessarily linked to the merits of the law. “I understand that there will be some group by the secret ballot request – said Renzi – but to me in character would love the idea that a parliamentary to a vote, and meets the vote.” always obvious, in fact vote.

->

from the divorce civil unions, 40 years of clashes Church-policy

 
 

The referendum on divorce

 

The crux of amendments

At the end will decide the president the Senate, although he must be released before the amendments node: pd Andrea Marcucci , author of “supercanguro” that would eliminate bulk thousands of requests for changes, has reiterated its readiness to give it up “a minute after the revocation of those presented by the League “that” Parliament must make laws and may not be the arena of shyster. ” Pietro Grasso has not yet delivered on the words of Bagnasco. He did it instead Laura Boldrini , President of the Chamber, who recalled that on the voting procedure “decide the Speaker of the House or the Senate under the Regulation, is not decided no one else.” “It’s a technical matter, it is for the regulatory presidents evaluate – underlined -. I think that any suggestion is not relevant. “

February 12 2016 (edited February 12, 2016 | 18:12)

© ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

LikeTweet

No comments:

Post a Comment