Share
” Loris has killed my father in law, Andrea Stival. I remembered everything when I visited him at the cemetery, but I have not said before because I was afraid that killed the little boy. ” The motive: “we were lovers.” And ‘the new truth of Veronica Panarello made in January to a psychologist of Catania prison, where she is held on suspicion of strangling his son 8 years old, 29 November 2014 at their home in Santa Croce Camerina.
a reconstruction that the bubble-in-law as “yet another woman’s madness”. “I am calm – says Andrea Stival – my position was assessed by investigators and the judiciary in detail.”
His new truth Veronica wants to hear is also the prosecutor of Ragusa, asking to inform the magistrates investigation. The prison administration does. But when the prosecutor goes to pick up her testimony she does not say anything relevant, claiming that she became famous, and who know even in Hollywood.
In January, the psychologist explained that the motive would be something that the little “had seen and that he should not see”, and suggests that the father was the lover. Then provides an initial reconstruction: has accompanied his youngest son to school, and when she returned home she found Andrea Stival that killed Loris. But no cameras takes the man into the house that day.
A month later, on February 8, to the experts and consultants who feel it to assess its degree of consent, as arranged by the Gup of Ragusa before whom the woman is on trial for premeditated murder and concealment of a corpse, provides a new reconstruction: Andrea Stival would meet by chance, returning from school, and he would have got in the car with her, lying on the back seat not to get noticed. Would go up to the house where there was Loris who says Veronica Stival, he threatened to reveal to her father the relationship between his grandfather and his mother. For that he would kill him, using an electric cable, and would force her to mettergli clamps in hands to make it stand still. And together, then, they would be released in the body by throwing it in the gully. would not speak for fear of reprisals on the youngest child.
“Reconstruction of Veronica Panarello – says the lawyer Andrea Stival, the lawyer Francesco Biazzo – is irrelevant, the fruit of his imagination, and I do not say it, but they say the acts of the trial and the investigation that excluded liability by Andrea Stival. This is demonstrated by the phone records and the testimony of his partner, Andreina. Veronica Panarello married a journalistic theory and made it his own . a relationship between them? All false, a big lie. the nth. “
on another silent investigators and judges: the prosecutor of Ragusa informed that” will not do, on this point, any representation, continuing to work as it always has. ” In the court reflected the irritation for the leak that officially have not yet been filed with the records of the investigation. David also is silent Stival, the husband of Veronica, the source nth version provided by his wife on the death of their son Loris. She denied that she had not brought it to school, but then he changed. He then said that the child had died while playing with the electrical clamps. To be rid of the body alone. Now there is another reconstruction and Veronica point the finger and accuses: “I killed the father, who was my lover.”
No comments:
Post a Comment