IN JUSTICE COMMISSION
Milan , March 4, 2015 – 17:36
The majority splits in the House Judiciary Committee. It was approved the new version of Article 1 of the text of the reform of the requirement to allow elongation, by half, of terms for corruption offenses. Vote against the Popular Area (Ap), Forza Italy, M5S. Ap – the parliamentary group that is part of the majority and that merged the exponents of the New Centre-Right, Union of the Centre and some independent – has sided against the new revised text that greatly extend, effectively doubling, the terms for the prescription. The text of the Government amending a first draft text based on the signature of the two speakers of the majority of the measure, Sofia Amoddio (Pd) and Stefano Dambruoso (Sc). Confirmation Alessandro Pagano , leader of the House Judiciary Committee in Ap. “At a meeting of the group – says Pagano – we decided that we will not vote the reform as it has been given by the government. It is absurd that you get a prescription for almost 30 years. ” The measure is expected in court in the House on March 16th.
Woods:” The majority draft agreement “
Asked sull’impasse, Minister Reforms, Maria Elena Boschi , had expressed confidence about a possible deal: “We are working with the minister Orlando, I’ve heard, with the president and members of the Committee Ferranti. The majority has already identified a draft agreement – concluded the Minister Woods – I am very confident that we will find an agreement. ” And, on the sidelines of the recording of Porta a Porta, the Minister of Justice, Andrea Orlando , with Ncd explains that “we will discuss, the examination of the measure is only the beginning – says the Keeper – but goes safeguarded specificity of the limitation period for offenses of corruption. ”
The proposal
In the House Judiciary Committee, the speakers Dambruoso Amoddio and, with the approval of the government, have therefore proposed an increase of the time limitation for corruption offenses more serious with the amendment to the time limitation shall be equal to the years of the maximum penalty increased by half (and no more than a quarter). Favorable Pd and Sel, oppose Ncd and Forza Italy. And just Sofia Amoddio defines “incomprehensible” the position of Ap: “In the method we have asked all groups contribute their proposals, on the merits, we took account of the need to influence the crime of corruption, and judicial corruption, increasing by half the term of limitation. I remember that corruption among all crimes against the public administration is the most difficult to detect because it is based on a pact between corrupt and corrupting. Hence the need for a long time for the statute of limitations. I think u ltimately that the position of the popular area is completely incomprehensible. “
The false accounting
The justice remains a slippery slope for the executive Matteo Renzi. The close on the crime of false accounting, announced Wednesday by the Minister of Justice Andrea Orlando, has not yet translated into amendment to the bill on corruption, which is currently before a Senate committee, and the entire measure will come into classroom to the vote no earlier than March 17, two weeks late on the original program. So much so that the proposal of the Democratic Party in the House to extend the statute of limitations for corruption offenses in a parallel bill has found precisely the opposite view of the popular area, the rib centrist majority.
March 4, 2015 | 17:36
© ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
No comments:
Post a Comment