The Supreme Court fade time for the verification of signatures submitted by the Committee for the Yes to the referendum on constitutional reforms. In advance of the deadline, set for 15agosto, the central election office of the Supreme Court is about to give the green light on Monday or at the latest next Tuesday, the ordinance admits (or rejects, but the hypothesis is absolutely residual) the referendum on the bill autumn Woods, both as regards the validity of the signatures (550 thousand would be valid on the 580 thousand signatures collected by the Committee) on the admissibility of that single question.
on the table the possibility of voting in November and December
an official time, the head of state will have 60 regions of time to proceed with the promulgation, on a proposal of the Council of Ministers, of a decree of the President of the Republic with the date of the referendum ballot. Under the bill, it must esssere a Sunday, placed between the fifth ° and 70 ° day after the Presidential Decree of calling the referendum. Among the most reliable date, those of 13 or 20 November, although many are betting sull’11 December.
“Referendum, surreal discussions like Pokémon”
Cociancich (Yes Committees): good news, now due time for debate
“A very positive news , which confirms the seriousness of our work “Just a yes” and that allows you to make the debate on these reforms remains limited at the parliamentary level, but becomes a debate between citizens. ” Roberto Cociancich, renziano coordinator of the organizing committee, positively commented the probable ok of the Supreme Court in the referendum. After the Supreme Court, the word goes to the Quirinale and the Government, which shall arrange a date for them, but Cociancich stresses the need for “a reasonable time, appropriate” before proceeding: “If it will be late October or November we will see, but it is important talking with citizens and deal “to” the merits of a fundamental reform. “
Referendum, 10 MPs Pd sign poster for No
The pressure of the minority Democratic Party to change the Italicum
addition to the Supreme Court, the ‘focus is on the debate within the Democratic Party, which with the passing of the days highlights a growing rift between renziani, deployed with no ifs and buts for Yes in the referendum, and the minority, which has not yet taken an official position but who has repeatedly reaffirmed its intention to tie support for the prime minister and the referendum an amendment dell’Italicum, the new electoral law which came into effect on 1 July. Not a simple touch up, as it would be willing to grant Renzi, but radical changes, without ruling out a return to Mattarellum.
“O Parliament Italicum change or will change it with the citizens by voting no to #referendone” sums up in a post on Twitter Miguel Gotor, senator of the minority dem and leading member of bersaniani. In this scenario also it weighs the position taken ten parliamentary Pd (7 senators and three deputies) who in recent days have officially taken a stand for the “No”, the first among the elect dem to proclaim their opposition to the reform.
Rosato: political suicide vote no just to annoy Renzi
For the moment, however, the pressure of the minority does not seem to shake the General Staff of Renzi, firm in defense dell’Italicum as is. “In the Democratic Party the right to dissent is guaranteed, but you can not ask us to have a neutral stance on the referendum. The Democratic Party has sided for the yes to any desired reform, built, voted to change for the better the institutional architecture of the country “, said the spokesperson and deputy secretary of the Democratic Party Lorenzo Guerini, reiterating that MPs who stand still for no do not They will be sanctioned. And if the renziano deputy and Dario Parrini Tuscan secretary speaks of “blatant pretext” of the thesis of a minority that acts as “opposition party”, the leader of dem to Ettore Rosato House calls a “political suicide, just to spite Renzi, vote no. “
© All rights reserved
No comments:
Post a Comment