Italicum, Woods minority Pd: “No changes are necessary” – The Messenger

“From the point of view of the government and the law works fine as it is, and there is no need to change.” This was stated by Minister for Reforms, Maria Elena Boschi, speaking to reporters at the end of the work of the Committee on Constitutional Affairs of.

To the reporters who reported the appeal of Area Riformista dialogue, Woods replied: “The dialogue is always open, and next week there will be a meeting of the parliamentary group which is the seat more appropriate. ” “Of course – he added – we are at a delicate stage, we can have the law in four weeks, so it is just a comparison. But there is every reason to proceed. “

M5S:” A farce. “ ” Only a farce. The parliamentary passage of the electoral law in the House is revealed early on a mockery to the extent that the mandate of the speaker is in the hands of the same party that has already voted and approved the inability to make changes to the text. ” So Members of M5S in constitutional affairs committee who made the request to change one of the speakers. “There is no desire to enter into the merits of a measure only seen by the majority as a practice to be processed quickly – continue deputies M5S – so you can show off the result in view of the upcoming elections.” “Our only interest is to improve a bill that has obvious shortcomings, especially if combined with the constitutional reform. Preferences, in this sense, become indispensable element and on this point we are ready to dialogue with the majority. But the Democratic Party – end – is ready to talk to us? “.

Area Riformista Renzi:” Look for the agreement. “ ” Do not divide the Democratic Party. ” Area Reform, the Pd component which belongs to the group leader Robert Hope, appeals to Renzi to mediate sull’Italicum. “So we have to make all the effort and take every possible leeway to find an agreement. Specifically Area Riformista asks to decrease the number of nominees for parties that do not take the majority of the premium.

“Italy – reads the document Area reformist – is finally coming out seven long years of crisis. Now we have the strength to indicate a positive path to our families and our businesses, but seven years of economic crisis we deliver a political system load of anxiety. The picture of Italy out of the Democratic Party presents new and old populism: Salvini, Grillo and Berlusconi. In this context, on the shoulders of the Democratic Party is the fundamental responsibility of guiding Italy.

“ Nation Party” means coincidence of fate between the country’s ability to cope and the possibility that this party is up to the challenges it has before him. The government has among its basic tasks constitutional reform and the election. The reforms represent a constituency element of the challenge that the Democratic Party has launched the country. But on what ground we stand this system reforms? This journey began with the so-called “Pact of the Nazarene ” , majority government more Forza Italy. This pact is no more.

Forza Italy has committed a serious mistake, leaving the table of reforms in an incomprehensible manner with the election of Sergio Mattarella to President of the Republic. Horizon looms another huge risk: a rift within the Democratic Party. If so on what ground we walk reforms? It is true that reforms are inevitable it is equally essential to do them well. None of us wants to vetoes, blackmail, ultimatums as well as we are convinced that the word cleavage should not be part of the vocabulary of the Democratic Party. This break can not afford it. Reflect. Without stopping. We can go twice as fast, if necessary.

But be careful, because the reforms have to lean on a wide. And this land is already restricted. It is only the majority to make reforms. And even if a piece of the Democratic Party there is, we make the essential design and weaker not stronger. There is still a space as possible to reach an agreement? Yes, there is.

We have before us a few more days between now and when the measure will come into the courtroom for final approval. So we have to make all the effort and take every possible leeway to find an agreement. We demand the strides that have been made since the gender issue and the access thresholds but we can still reopen the text in the House in accordance with the group of the Democratic Party in the Senate, and with all the government majority. It is for us a priority the need to reduce the number of nominees among the parties that do not take the majority of the premium. Do not divide the Democratic Party. The outcome would lead to too narrow the field on which these reforms are founded. The challenge of reform is critical to drive our country into a new phase and must be the challenge of the whole Democratic Party. ”
             
             
                         
         

             Wednesday, April 8, 2015, 17:47 – Last Updated: 18:06
© ALL RIGHTS RESERVED