08:08 June 3, 2015
(AGI) – Rome, June 3 . – “Now that the regional elections are behind us, you can ‘say: Campania with the case ended in an impasse legal unpublished, that will’ also very challenging and interesting dissolve, provided you do not let yourself be pulled by the jacket from any fear of exploitation. My opinion? I do not give for granted the interpretation that De Luca should be suspended immediately after the proclamation. ” Cosi ‘in the columns of’ The Republic ‘, the president of anti-corruption Raffaele Cantone. About the timing, according to which some argue that De Luca should not have time to appoint his council, but be suspended one minute after the proclamation “I think – says Canton – the issue is controversial. There is in my view, a ‘ other interpretation. Articles 7 and 8 of the decree law that call Severino foresee the revocation or suspension.
And it intervenes in cases where the administrator has been convicted but that ‘not’ passed in judged, just like De Luca, at first instance sentenced for abuse of office. In other words: if you suspend immediately, without allowing directors elected to the board to settle and work in relation to the junta, should declare the dissolution of the advice for impossibility ‘of operation. And the suspension provided by Severino, which has a function of a precautionary nature and a provisional nature, would become a de facto decline “.
But what about the recent judgment of the Supreme Court, which established that the suspension and ‘an “act bound” and that, in the presence of conditions, there is no evaluation of discretionary’, State questions “when the conditions occur? They are rooted in the time when there is’ the only appointment, or when the administrator, in this case the Governor of the Region, has taken regularly by those functions which must be temporarily moved away? “(AGI) On possible political readings of this story “I know that the drama of this story, and ‘that a purely technical legal matter will be’ accessed with a key or political manipulation. But I’m reading that did not affect me. Instead, I believe that the Prime Minister should appeal to all the best advocacy of the State and Italian jurists. Without any fear or pressure, ’cause the solution that is now will’ law. “As for the possible solutions according Canton” a law would be meaningless.
And for any changes in Parliament there ‘need Rates & solutions certainly meditate. Authority as’ anti-corruption, its June 10, we will launch a comprehensive proposal on Severino to be entrusted to Parliament, for some damage and problems that Severino creates in other directions, which has nothing to do De Luca. ‘Cause that legislation and’ sacrosanct, and ‘indispensable and must remain. But a measure of improvement that it should be thought about. “In respect of the black list Antimafia” I think Mr Bindi, even though he had a specific experience, he was doing his job very well, with the ability ‘to take control of the topics and the complexity’ and that of the nodes’ of its senior politicians: once Did I also recognized the presence of the Prime Minister. But this story of unpresentable and ‘was, for me, a serious misstep, an institutional error. “” For a variety of reasons. First and ‘risky and misleading logic “institutionalize” the unpresentable, which by their very nature can be candidates, eligible, not investigated yet unfit to enter the civil service, for example for unscrupulous transformation; or why ‘and’ more ‘serious a politician is accompanied constantly in the gray or people affected, compared to being indicted for abuse whatsoever. Second, in this way, it is likely to produce un’eterogenesi of ends; that ‘, to give the blue sticker to many who, not seeing himself included in that list, they feel fully legitimized. And finally, ’cause that brings the mafia and its fundamental, indisputable sacred function would say, to do and to talk about anything else. The committee should investigate, seize links, investigate phenomena “. (AGI).
No comments:
Post a Comment