Friday, May 27, 2016

Prescription, clash in the majority. Ap: “Speakers Pd withdraw amendments” – The Republic

Rome – Prescription is open clash in the majority. A to discuss and to create tension in the majority are ten amendments on the issue of prescription and interceptions signed by Casson and Cucca senators. Issues on which there was convergence of 5stars. Their presentation has aroused the protest of the popular area who has put sideways warning the dem from seeking alternative majorities “targeted”. The leader in the Senate, Renato Schifani, who said “no” to “transversal majorities” , asks that the amendments are withdrawn, because the result of consultation between allies. “If the state proves to have an interest in pursuing a defendant – is the position of Senator Felice Casson – the prescription would not be more logical and legal sense. At the same time, we must protect the needs of the citizen not to be subjected to eternal processes . <'p> The bill Justice . The discord amendments to the bill came from the Chamber regarding the reform of the code of criminal procedure. And the Prisons. Around 41 articles on which the parties have submitted 800 amendments (among others 300 WiFi, 100 M5s, 60 Pd, 100 ‘mixed group’) which will be discussed, starting with the week following that in the June elections, in the Constitutional Affairs Committee of the Senate. On these delicate issues of Justice there are positions diversified within the majority in the Senate, within the Democratic Party. The Democratic Party, on these issues, he often had disagreements with the New center.

The protest of the centrists . Renato Schifani, Ap parent, protest: “We learn with astonishment that the two speakers, both members of the Democratic Party, have submitted amendment proposals on the prescription that arise in direction exactly contrary to earlier commitments from the Minister Justice Andrea Orlando. We invite colleagues Casson and Cucca the immediate withdrawal of their proposals never discussed and not shared within the coalition “.

Zanda, leader of dem, brakes . But now The parent dem, Luigi Zanda , brakes. And try to turn off the fuse of controversy: the speakers amendments are only “working hypothesis,” he explains. And their content “will then be analyzed and compared in the next few days in the Democratic Party, with the majority and the Commission”. Words that have cheered the hearts of Ncd-UDC: “The words of Zanda – replied Schifani – reassure us that the Casson-Cucca amendments are to be considered in a personal capacity and not as speakers. Although the fact remains abnormal for its connotations unprecedented. “

Cucca ready to withdraw signature. The Senator Joseph Cucca , after the controversy, announced the withdrawal of the signature. “I signed the amendments on prescription – explained – for the sole purpose of making a contribution to the wider discussion possible.” “Ahead of unacceptable political exploitation on my signature – he added – to retire in a moment, convinced as I am that the point of fall will certainly be different.”

Casson: “We will discuss with Ap” . “Since the beginning of this legislature – said Casson – on justice issues there have always been divisions within the majority and the government. We have always found the center contrasting with the various groups and parties of the center. It is that Verdini is not in the majority formally. it is part of the majority of the New Centre-Right, and we will discuss with them, there is no foreclosure. “

amendments of discord . To provoke the reaction of the centrists in particular two amendments: one that proposes to permanently stop the prescription after the first degree. And one that binds the beginning of the times of prescription at the time when the crime report is acquired by the judge. The example is that of occupational asbestos disease, also reported a number of years (and therefore with a high risk of prescription). According to Casson-Cucca amendments, the prescription should start from the time of acquisition of the crime report. “The punishment needs of the state – says Senator Felice Casson – arises when the State becomes aware that the crime was committed.”

The left is pd agree . Senator Lucrezia Ricchiuti, on behalf Left Democratic Party , shares the Casson-Cucca initiative. “We note with satisfaction – states – of the amendments on the prescription.” “It is a definite step forward, in the sign of a true reform, setting principles for which the limitation period is triggered only by the discovery of the crime and not from its perpetuation (often – in corruption – none of the players has an interest in bringing out). the course is permanently discontinued the trial or at most to the verdict in the first degree. Text in the attic the law Cirielli is a necessity of the judicial system and the country. “

The amendments on wiretapping dem . As for the interceptions , this is an enabling law. The task of the Senate (and before the Chamber) is therefore to give indications to the Government specifying what it should do in the legislative decree . A delicate point concerns the publication of acts. “Besides taking into account the models already identified by the circular of the prosecutors in Turin, Milan and Rome – said Casson – we asked the government to take into account the decisions of the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg. This we have written to protect press freedom and the right to information. the balance is delicate to find. But we must find it. “

LikeTweet

No comments:

Post a Comment