Referendum reforms, the ANPI and the resistance to the Democratic Party which for months has it that the partisans “will change to” – The Daily

Change your mind, feel again, you who you have never changed. Change your mind, you who for ideas, to this place where we are, you have staked your future, your youth, your loves. Change your mind, you who have done nothing but defend it for a lifetime: defending a part, that of those who gave us Italy better than it was. There partisans calls, yes I know, but changed side, come here. The left, the “true” , is for yes, come with us, says the association of the Democratic Party partisans. But they do nothing. And in Italy – Also in that Renzi – sounds strange that one does not pass from side to side. The partisans have both this thing of consistency, it does not stir a place: at the congress in 347 voted for the report reiterated that the ANPI defends the Constitution as it is and then the referendum will be for not. And now they do, defend the Constitution. Carlo Smuraglia , the president of the partisans, tries again, maybe they did not understand: “Our statute of moral authority – marks – requires us to defend the Constitution says literally in the spirit with which it was drawn up by constituents. “

for months, the fact of expressing an opinion, the ANPI feels dragged by the hair into the mire of controversy which has never wanted nor started. “ Just provocations ” conjures now Smuraglia , a man who has done all his life, the advocate of labor law and for a while ‘time also parliamentary. Smuraglia knows how the ciarlona politics and mob: slogans, sound bites, always at the limit, and sometimes beyond. “Just provocations” repeats.

I have been from the beginning, in a surprising communication strategy for those who, like the current top of the Democratic Party , is usually careful to avoid boomerang. Instead, for months, the Democratic Party has tried to divert the path of the PNA, giving resonance and centrality to the stance of an association with 150 thousand subscribers , hitherto unnoticed, ignored. The Democratic Party renziano which has tried and tried, never openly. Always stored and recoil. Like last time, yet another. “The Anpi surely as national executive took a line, then there are many partisans, the real ones, they will vote yes,” the minister said Woods. After a few hours we are talking about defense “words manipulated”, who have been recalled other times, before the matteorisponde .

Ilfattoquotidiano.it had He recounted many such verbal retaliation Democrats loyal to the line against the PNA local sections. It was a month ago, at the Liberation Day . But he did not have a crystal ball. “What about the ANPI in the referendum on reforms?” He started to say in Tuscany a few months ago Dario Parrini , deputy ultrarenziano and regional secretary of the party in Florence. A colleague Emilia, Giuseppe Paruolo , a regional councilor in Bologna had called “singular” that the ANPI is expressed on the reform of the Constitution. Indeed he had compared the association of partisans to “ association of blood donors .” But the fight with local partisans eventually became national.

It ‘happened after that Fabrizio Rondolino has got bad words with Smuraglia, guilty of having reiterated the Done that would Anpi told to vote no in the referendum, you know what a surprise. Excuse me, but vote with Salvini and Brunetta , they pointed out: “In the Resistance There were also monarchists – he said – and in one of the most popular articles, Article 11 , the term divorces (the war, ed ) was wanted by the representative of the ‘ Man any , instead of the softer ‘rejects’. ” “My idea – he concluded – is that we must always be vigilant, democracy is never at rest.” But Rondolino this thing of democracy had not gone to genius and answered using the pages of ‘ unit , the same newspaper that has now put under disciplinary procedure a guilty chronicler of defending the ideas of Berlinguer. “To bother the Resistance, anti-fascism, the partisans to criticize the Senate reform is first of all, an insult to the Resistance , anti-fascism, the partisans” had written Rondolino, from Rondolino . The ANPI wrote angrily to ‘ Drive , had called for a response from the Director, Erasmo D’Angelis . D’Angelis has never uttered a word.

The government eventually married the Rondolino line. The Minister for Reforms Maria Elena Boschi shows up at one of the first initiatives of the committees for the Yes and threw out as if it was the snitch: “It’s a little ‘strange,” says that in the face contrary to the constitutional reforms, “there are also pieces of the left that embody certain values ​​in defense of the Charter and vote along with Casapound in the referendum”. Cuperlo protest, she confirms: “I have repeatedly heard equate those who vote yes to reforms in Verdini. I have merely found that those who will vote no will do it together with Casapound “. Mirror reflection, some say it is.

The Anpi talks for months with the deaf and age has nothing to do. Seventy senators of the Democratic Party – even among those who are not in the circle of ultra renziani, like Valeria Fedeli and Anna Finocchiaro – ANPI asked “not to persevere on line not without a dialectical confrontation with members of the association who wish instead to support the reasons for the confirmation and commitment in favor of the referendum, yes, in the conviction of contributing to strengthening democracy “. But the “dialectic” is already, with a conference in Rimini, after all members of the association were able to express themselves in sections throughout Italy: 347 yes and 3 abstentions . Indeed, “perhaps our method would be an example to follow for all”: that is, to participate, decide and keep what you decide, it is said. Elsewhere they are the ones who ensure that will never become prime minister without going through elections. The ANPI decided and does not distort the will of those who want to say yes, as Hell , the commander cheese Germano Nicolini , which 97 years has “no desire to be in the company of Salvini , Casapound , the comedian and Meloni.”

So the message is that those who vote no are partisans a little ‘fake. But “no gaffe” ensures Renzi. In fact the only thing that is really partigianio is that it is patient, perhaps for that thing of never giving up. starts all over again: defend the Constitution “is an obligation, it is a duty.” And this time there was hurt Emeritus President of the Republic, the first inspirer of constitutional reform from the awkward position of those who had the good fortune to make the Resistance. “We want freedom for all – says the senator for life Giorgio Napolitano – but no one can say though: I defend the Constitution by voting no and the others do not do it.” To say that “offends me too. I went deep offense . ”

The use of history, like that of the “real partisans” in the end takes a little ‘hands. Someone among the fans of the Secretary-president has the idea of ​​asking help from some big old and finds himself to be talked into small posters Who is gone, Pietro Ingrao and Nilde Iotti , in wikiquote style. The daughter of Ingrao protest, said that his father’s sentence is taken out of context. To answer Alessia Rotta , Praetorian renziana, argues that with Ingrao phrases one we can do pretty much what they like.

But politics has nothing to do, you damns Smuraglia, it has to do with the Constitution, the Constitution and just. “I send home to Renzi does not even think about it: if someone wants to draw political consequences is the business of politics, not ours. The government is in office until enjoys the confidence of Parliament. ” Who cares what happens to Renzi, if repeated for months that if he loses resigns. Who cares what happens to Renzi. Well, perhaps that’s what you can not stand in the Democratic Party.

->