Prescription, People’s Area against the speakers amendments Pd: “They go withdrawn, no transverse majorities” – The Daily

“We learn with astonishment that the two speakers, both members of the Democratic Party , presented amendatory” proposals on the prescription “that are placed directly against the commitments previously assumed by the Minister Orlando . Invite colleagues Casson and Cucca to the immediate withdrawal of their proposals never discussed and not shared within the coalition “. This was stated by the leader of the Senate Ap Renato Schifani saying “no” to the formation of “transversal majorities” on the text. On the amendments to Felice Casson and Cucca Giuseppe , in fact, is the adhesion of the Five Star Movement , as well as the minority of the Democratic Party ( of which on the other hand it is part Casson). Cucca had said among other things that the New Centre-Right the discussion on the point would be made after the local elections.

But alfaniani have suffered put the record straight: “popular Area abstained in the final vote in the House on the text of the prescription because he has not shared the content, but by relying on the commitment of the Minister Orlando to review some points that dilaterebbero excessively, and in clear violation of the ‘ Article 111 Constitution , the statute of limitations of the offense, “said the president of the centrist senators observing how tabling amendments is” in blatant violation of the fundamental principle that any proposal emendativa the rapporteur has to answer to the synthesis of

Hence the invitation of Schifani the withdrawal of the amendments on the prescription. “If they do not, you unequivocally prospetterebbe the hypothesis of a cross-party majority that would see excluded popular area, as well as the one that had to be envisaged on the issue of civil unions, a subject still alien to the government program. Trusting that this scenario does not find confirmation in the next few days, we hope that our firm and legitimate invitation is received by the Democratic Party, in order to counter consequential political assessments to the scenarios that could lead to cross majorities regarding a sensitive and delicate issue that touches the rights of citizens and in particular the duration of the “concludes Schifani processes.

->