History Article
Close
This article was published on 21 January 2015 to 06:38 hours.
THE “SANCTIONS” REQUESTS
According to Pg for discrediting the prosecution
The magistrate must leave Milan and functions
prosecutor
ROME
It is an indictment of “hard” one sent yesterday by the Attorney General of the Supreme Court to the CSM against Alfredo Robledo, deputy prosecutor of Milan in the news for his clash with the Chief Prosecutor Edmondo Bruti Liberati. “Very hard,” is the comment that is gathered at the Palace of the Marshals between those who have read the pages of the act of incrimination signed by Pg Gianfranco Ciani, in which the holder of the disciplinary action asks that pending the final verdict, the CSM transfer Robledo elsewhere for the discrediting of Milan and remove functions Pm. The allegations, very serious, are: violation of the duties of impartiality, fairness and confidentiality.
In the viewfinder, an “exchange of favors” with the lawyer of the Northern League Domenico Aiello: the latter would have learned from Robledo confidential, even marked confidential, on the investigation concerning undue reimbursement of the directors of the regional Lombardia (conducted by the pool led by Robledo) and in return the confidential information would have turned against the “common enemy” Gabriele Albertini, Roberto Maroni’s rival for the presidency of the Region and counterparty Robledo in proceedings against him for aggravated defamation.
The vice president of CSM John Legnini set for February 5 the hearing at which the disciplinary section will give preliminary emergency on precautionary measure. Meanwhile, the procedure opened by the Commission to assess the possible transfer office of Robledo and / or wildlings was suspended. Obviously at this point jumps every possible mediation of the Vice Legnini.
The Heads of incrimination are four episodes revolve around known, ie those for which last December 18 the magistrate of Brescia closed the proceedings against Robledo for revelation of secrecy, believing that for this offense were unusable interceptions (legitimately) acquired by the DDA in Reggio Calabria and transmitted power to Brescia. Received the decree, Ciani has asked the entire file with the acts and noted in the behavior of Robledo four disciplinary offenses.
First of all, contrary to the duties of impartiality and discretion for divulging news about acts of a secret. Robledo (which a few months ago Brutes had transferred to the Department criminal enforcement deeming that it was appropriate to direct that the Offences Against the Pa) would reveal clues to Aiello borne of suspects initial investigation (League and PDL) but would also informed on 18 December 2012, that the next day would end under investigation other councilors and 7-8 in the second week of January, the prosecutor would have proceeded even against opposition councilors, thereby infringing the rights of those who had not yet investigated and the image of the respective parties (PD, IDV, Motion pensioners). Knowing of course that the lawyer would have shot (as he did) the information to the League. “Man of the word! Great magistrate! “Writes a sms Aiello Robledo. That responds: “Dear lawyer, promissio boni viri obbligatio east.” More: Aiel lo when he learned that the Express was about to publish a service on the survey of Bossi father and son and Belsito, according to the indictment Robledo suggested, almost dettandogliela, for instance to obtain copies of documents not yet Note, providing them an unfair advantage. And when the application was rejected, hath laid the responsibility of Brutes and other colleagues. Behavior “grossly unfair” writes Ciani. According to which, all these “favors” to Aiello served could ask for in exchange for help in the matter Albertini.
The former MEP – worried about the investigation against him for slander, born of a complaint to the Minister of Justice in which he had accused of misconduct Robledo – aimed to obtain immunity from the European Parliament and therefore had presented some confidential documents allla committee. Robledo asked insistently and obtained from Aiello to get him a copy to counter with its own touch to send to Strasbourg for blocking immunity. Behavior ‘serious’, writes Ciani, both for illegally used and because he knew that Robledo Aiello, to get those papers, you would be facing the top of the League, which was investigating his office.
© ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
Permalink
No comments:
Post a Comment