MILAN – comes from the stage of the Human Factor, in Milan, the last attack on the government Renzi by the leader Sel, Nichi Vendola , for which “the renzismo is updated version of neo conservatism in the Italian version. ” The number one of the Left and freedom he rails against the prime minister and the Covenant of the Nazarene without using uncertain terms: “The Covenant of the Nazarene is the time of the founding of the Nation Party. It is the burial of the dialectic between left and right, between justice and injustice. And it is organic in this project that the policy is only the procession of the comments while elsewhere practicing the art of command, “he said. In this view, argues Vendola, the President of the Republic should not be “the guarantor of a wicked deal or oligarchy, but the guarantor of the Constitution.” To this, he added, “we must prevent the screen of the Quirinale p rojectiles that bad movie called ‘pact of the Nazarene.’” Then harsh words towards the Prime Minister: Government Renzi, according Vendola, is in fact responsible for the loss of autonomy of Parliament, which has become a ‘votificio’: “We judge negatively the fact that the executive with Renzi has cannibalized the legislative power. Not like Berlusconi , very well. We have to recover the sovereignty of Parliament, “he said.
Coordination forces left . In a situation like this, he added Vendola, you must create a ‘coordination’ of the left, bringing together the various parties, also from below, for joint work: “We must think that there is not really a ‘Pope stranger ‘, a charismatic leader, but the construction of a collective leadership that is the only engine of the left. ” Then he explained: “We can imagine the creation of a coordination, not made by leaders, but by re presentatives of political parties, organizations and associations involved in this collective project, that should work throughout the month of February to decide the national campaigns that cause a mixing of peoples. In this coordination and its projection to these comrades should be allowed dual card or double militancy. Then we will meet in the spring to take stock and to insediarci in universities, schools, creating room for the rights and solidarity – added Vendola -. We can not be left in the future if we are simply the sum of the left of the past “.
Seeking Agreement . A few days after the election of the head of state, the Democratic Party tries to avoid splits. A broad consensus on the name of the next president of the Republic can only do good to democracy, sostene Gianni Cuperlo , parliamentary and former chairman of the Democratic Party, who on the sidelines of the conference to be held in Milan Sel has sottolienato as ” the question is posed in terms of the Quirinale paradoxically simple enough. We must discuss the criteria that the Democratic Party and the profile of a candidate authoritative, independent, able to be what it should be: the ultimate guarantor of the Constitution. Then if on that application flow other political forces and there is a broad consensus, a broad agreement in Parliament, this is only good to the Italian democracy. “
The PD will be compact for the election of the President of the Republic? “I hope – answers the exponent of the minority dem – that there is a unified proposal, serious, independent. It would be something that would give greater balance and guarantee to the path that we are going to do this week.”
tensions within the party the former president uses soft tones: “On the electoral law have made proposals, some have been successful, some not. We defended our positions, then we are in a party, a party is a community, is discussed. The problem is when the parties do not argue, when one decides that’s all. If we discuss it means that there is life on Mars as well as also in the Democratic Party. “
Party united . Nette, on de-mergers, the words of Stefano Fassina , who was also present in the initiative of Sel: “Rest in the Democratic Party. We must leave aside the discussion on the containers and must work hard on the content. Not need to take shortcuts on the containers. ” As for the Hill, the former deputy minister noted controversially that you should work to agreed criteria, but it seems that there are within the Democratic Party: “The new president should ensure independence, experience, knowledge of the dynamics and parliamentary authority. We have to find convergence on this and it is not obvious. ” Agrees with this view, the deputy secretary Pd, Lorenzo Guerini , which, however, also arguing that we need to “work with this spirit, not imagining that everyone has a flag to plant,” points out that ” imagine their own to elect the President of the Republic is to ima gine something that can not be done. So – detects Guerini – you have to start from the Democratic Party, but with the knowledge – warning – that we are not self-sufficient and we need to talk to all the political forces in Parliament “. Word, then the ‘consultations’ of Renzi and, it is said, also in a face to face with Bersani. “I do not think – notes Guerini – that everything depends on a meeting between the two leaders. It starts by seeking unity within the Democratic Party knowing – reiterated – that we have a great responsibility: we express 450 electors.”
The name that should do the prime minister for the armchair to Colle Goofy Civati seems to have no doubts: “I’ve got a name: it is Romano Prodi. I do not know if you’ve ever heard of. I do not understand why the secretary of the Democratic Party has never wanted to say a word, “said the deputy dissident who, in contrast, sees no chance for Giuliano Amato:” It seems to me a proposal that looks a lot in the past. I do not think that if Renzi who can afford it a name so that the First Republic. ” To those who objected that the 5 Star Movement would not agree on the nomination of Prodi, says: “I do not think this is so. Go and read the blog Grillo …”. And on another point Civati is categorical: “I wish that the candidate was not decided by Berlusconi, a veto of Berlusconi, the usual setting. There are other political forces in Parliament. Just look around. It depends on the name.” Civati unbuttons not, however, on what was stated recently by Fassina, and that is that at the head of 101 against Prodi Renzi there really was: “Do not ever tell him. Nobody knows, nobody wanted to investigate, however. The secretary of the Democratic Party in charge for a year did not want to spend a minute on the subject. ”
The tensions within the Democratic Party does not seem to subside and, when asked to comment on the insults on Facebook and on his blog, Civati responds: “It’s not that I do send away for some frantic.” But will remain in the party? “I hope not to lose anything, it is certain that the signals are not comforting,” he added, stating that “there is no design to break” the Democratic Party. “For me it is painful to say so, I come by UL,” he added, referring Civati hypothesis of a split in the Democratic Party. Then launched a further appeal for an opening to the minority dem to Renzi, but he also said, citing the premier, that if this does not happen “there will a reason.”
Voltage Fi. On the other side, that of Forza Italy, speaks Raffaele Lease , long term peak of the internal opposition to Berlusconi: “If the idea is blind obedience and one vote blindly my answer can not be that bad, “said the MEP Maria Latella on Skytg24. “If – he added – will discuss the candidate’s profile at the Quirinale the theme will change. As for us we aim to a head of state autonomous, authoritative, and that is not necessarily an expression of the left.”
Then another jab to the line of the former Knight: “I believe that Fi risk of becoming a tool to allow Renzi to get his results. We are voting on a reform that is not at all far relative to what we have always said in these 20 years. “
Even Sen. Maurizio Gasparri is convinced that there is need for” a figure shared warranty for all “, but “no to a single color Pd. The left has monopolized the top government and it is time that the head of state is an expression of that vast area of consensus of the moderates. It is essential in fact, at this stage of important reforms, choose a political , a guarantor of the institutions. Assumptions other there are none and would still be unacceptable. “
No comments:
Post a Comment