History of the article
Close
This article was published on February 15, 2016 at 13:42.
the last change is the 15 February 2016 at 16:07.
“the controversy about the survivors’ pensions is totally unfounded. Obviously there are those who look for easy visibility and likes to invent a problem that there is not then be able to say to have it fixed. The bill delegation of government explicitly leaves intact all the treatments in place. ” He said the Labour Minister, Giuliano Poletti, stressing that “the future is not studying any intervention and survivors’ pensions; all that the delegation aims is to overcome overlaps and abnormal situations. “
Poletti: totally unfounded controversy about reversibility
The government” wants to give and not take away , “reiterated Poletti,” for that, to combat poverty, the stability law is expected the allocation of 600 million for 2016 and structural 1 billion from 2017. “
Unions: Government of reversibility pulls stone and then hide the hand
But unions are not convinced and attack: “On the survivors’ pensions, the government takes the stone and then hide your hand, “they said in a joint statement the confederal secretaries of Cgil, Cisl and Uil, Vera Lamonica, and Maurizio Petriccioli Domenico Proietti after the controversy of recent days and after the clarification arrived today by the Minister of Labour, which has branded as baseless rumors an intervention and survivors’ pensions. “In the draft enabling law on poverty it is written that it intends to operate a” rationalization “of welfare benefits, even a social security benefit by introducing selectivity principles by Isee application. The stated goal is to find the resources for a national plan against poverty, but once again we discover an underlying cynicism: if you have to give something to the poor must take it to those who are just as poor. This logic that instead do not see when you work on enterprises or also cut taxes for those who could and should pay for them, “added the unionists.
The criticism of Damian and Salvini
the controversy erupted yesterday on the draft law (approved by the CDM 28 January and landed in committee in the House) on the fight against poverty that reorders even the nature of welfare and social security benefits. Among the measures hypothesized that (even if not explicitly spelled out by the bill) to review survivors’ benefits (ie those paid to the heirs to the death of the pensioner or of a worker who dies having completed the requirements for the check) hooking ISEE, for which counts the family income and not the individual. It had been the same Cesare Damiano, president of the Chamber Labour Commission to censor “the possibility of cutting survivors ‘benefits’ in the delegation of the Government on the issue of combating poverty. A hypothesis called “unacceptable.” Earlier also the leader of the League Matteo Salvini had lashed out this possibility ( “A government that makes cash on the dead makes me sick”).
Palazzo Chigi: authorization gives does not take away
at that point, had to intervene in Palazzo Chigi evening to point out that if there will be rationalization “will be only to avoid waste and duplication, not to make cash into a war between the poor”. With a note reassuring: “The delegation of the Government gives does not take away.”
© ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
Permalink
No comments:
Post a Comment