Tuesday, September 23, 2014

It grows on the frond Bruno And for dem is hard to give up Violante – Corriere della Sera

It grows on the frond Bruno And for dem is hard to give up Violante – Corriere della Sera



Milan , September 23, 2014 – 7:50

     
     
 

ROME – Today Parliament returns to vote in an attempt to elect the two Constitutional Court judges missing since June, despite last is an attempt to avert a court in extremis with a new one, can double rejection for the ticket of candidates Luciano Violante-Donato Bruno. Bogged down by the likely withdrawal of consent for Bruno after reports (not denied) of his involvement in the investigation of the Prosecutor of Isernia in the investigation on the company’s failure ITTIERRE. He and his party at the time refuse to step back to a report published by the daily show, but in the Democratic Party MPs are increasingly unwilling to vote for him. But his destiny brings to Violante, since no guarantees for Bruno the center-right do not vote; That’s why last night Bruno gave birth to a statement in which he promises to step aside if, once elected to the See, Isernia came from a trial. Not from “simple” investigated, then.

‘exclude any type of illegal conduct put in place from me in the story ITTIERRE – says the senator of Forza Italy -. To date, I reiterate that I have not received any notice of. It is clear that if there was a measure of trial would have no hesitation in taking appropriate decisions. ” An announcement made in an attempt to save his own position and that of the candidate indicated by the Democratic Party, without which Bruno would have no chance of passing.


will be enough? Difficult. Last night many predicted yet another nothing done, if anything, for the View and the remote possibility of appointing the two components “lay” missing the new Supreme Judicial Council. If this were to happen (the “eligible candidates” are the lawyer Paola Balducci indicated by Sel and Senator Fi Zanettin), the CSM could settle and begin working. Otherwise, it is likely that you decide one unpacking of the votes for the two bodies, in order to resolve the issue as soon as CSM and give the parties time to unleash the skein of the Constitutional Court. Anything but simple.
The possibility that the candidacy of Violante decade following the rejection of Bruno, in fact, brings with it a real risk of paralysis. None is capable of ensuring a compact vote of Pd on another name. Indeed, within the party is almost certain that a large proportion of the parliamentary group face the wall to impede different choices. Moreover, the former judge and former president of the Chamber, reached 542 votes (a majority with which, under the Constitution, you can elect the President of the Republic but not a judge of the Consulta, as this loads the quorum remains fixed at three-fifths of those eligible), and should be out of the running for his problems but not the other candidate of the ticket. A paradoxical situation, which currently leads to the exclusion, in a democratic house, other designations.

At the same Pd, but yesterday there were those who pointed out another paradox : the fact that an institution like the Parliament in joint session is called to choose a major office without being able to get official information about a candidate (Bruno) from another institution, the prosecution. However, the laws provide for this. A way out there would be, but it can open only the person concerned. Codes in hand, the only possibility that the prosecutors in Isernia ufficializzi status of any investigation of Bruno (or denies) resides in a request of the Prosecutor; other communications by the investigators are not provided.

The senator of Forza Italy does not seem willing at the time to make At this rate, perhaps in fear of a confirmation of journalistic indiscretions, and is limited to the promise of resignation in case of trial. Probably prompted by those who would attend to the matter, inside and outside his party. Without much hope, though. Also because of the hesitation of those who, in the Democratic Party, considers it unfair that any withdrawal from the race of Violante should depend on the legal position of the name matched by the center-right to his. To affirm this principle were launched fairly clear signs of unwillingness to vote other names proposed by the party leaders. For some time rumors are circulating about alternative candidates of Augusto Barbera and younger Stefano Ceccanti, considered closer to Renzi; but after what has happened to their eventual investiture would be anything but a foregone conclusion. Perhaps that is why the Secretary to the Presidency of the Council Luca Lotti in recent days has taken to reassure MPs that Violante was and would remain the candidate chosen by Renzi.


Assuming instead that the Secretary-premier has really other preferences , it would still have to deal with the orientation of the parliamentary groups for composition date back to when he was not to rule the party and the definition of the electoral rolls. One more reason, if today the situation is not sbloccasse, to take time to study and try other solutions.

September 23, 2014 | 07:50

© ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

LikeTweet

No comments:

Post a Comment