“Where is it written that the Pd wants to abolish Article 18?”. The question comes from Pier Luigi Bersani , diMartedì in the air tonight LA7 , has distanced itself from the government’s proposal to remove the provision for recruits and flip renziana the definition of “ideological totem”: “It is not a symbol – he says – has a certain symbolic aspect, and you can not throw it away.” And thanks to ‘ Article 18 “the work is not only salary, your dignity, your freedom, your right to the transformation of this world.” But the former secretary dem also warns the President of the Council that often recalls the electoral success of 40 per cent obtained by the party in past European . “With my 25% Renzi is ruling – said Bersani -. I’m not there to Government , I’m okay, do not ask for recognition but respect. “
It also intends to cheer him on his eventual ambitions borrowing the hashtag that the former mayor Florence used with Letta before taking his place at Palazzo Chigi (“I heard that I would have some kind of goal, I’d be working on some kind of plan. Renzi A and others say ‘you are calm’, but seriously, do not pretend. I am only loyal to the ideals of my youth, I’m fine, I have nothing to ask “), then rejects the possibility of an eventual pact with Silvio Berlusconi on the labor reform : “You talk to everyone but the word covenant is too narrow, there is a reason or a policy number” to refer to others. And do not miss the jab “pedagogical” all ‘ entourage of Renzi , where “they are now explaining to me like you’re in a party, are fans of the company, fantastic. But let me explain to these guys that a direction is not the place to take it or leave out what has already happened. “
Words that come on the day when the minority Pd Palazzo Madama – 29 to 38 senators – presented seven amendments to the Jobs Act , which concern all the ‘ Item 4 of the enabling law on contract protections growing and then the reorganization of the contractual forms . The proposed amendments to provide full protection of the ‘ Article 18 – hence the possibility of reinstatement in the case of wrongful dismissal – to all new hires “in the fourth year of employment” with contract safeguards growing. And yet clarified and objective parameters by which it is possible to predict a review of job responsibilities , priority to the reform of social welfare with respect to the revision of types of contracts – of which explicitly calls for reduce is the number – and remote controls available only on the plants and not on the workers . Amendments Ncd , says the chairman of the Senate Committee on Labor Maurizio Sacconi , will not vote “never” and who are “inadmissible” because they emerge “a vision of old ideological” . But the minority Democratic Party does not rule out the possibility of a referendum among members in the event that Renzi is not open to mediation.
Bersani, “Renzi does not ask for advice, but we can not give” – At Renzi advice to have a more friendly relationship with his party more conversational Here you have to solve the country’s problems, “says Bersani diMartedì . On the battle on the Jobs Act “to Renzi say that the accusations made by him are the same as Tremonti and Fornero . I held firm, point, “explains the former secretary who, in answer to those who ask if the Democratic Party is becoming like Forza Italy , after a short pause, said:” The government has all the conditions to last. We have a new road in front of the political system in Italy, “or you take this road or” let’s stay on the road for the last twenty years. “
Bersani defines the Chairman of the Board “type quick, smart, who has the energy of a nuclear power plant, impatient, a true hero who has among its features that do not ask for advice. But we are of the old guard, battles but we will have seen, we can also give some advice. ” With Renzi “We rarely hear,” adds Bersani, who then says, “I hope that having before 1,500 meters and not 100, this energy takes a rhythm, a cadence. Do not go out of our troubles with sudden miracles, you need to be sure that you have taken the right lane. “
” Meeting with the majority for single document. Referendum among voters is a last resort “ – The proposed amendments to the Law delegation proposers ask for a meeting by the majority to try to draft a joint document in view of the Directorate on Monday. For about two hours, in the dining room at the Aldo Moro, the leaders of the various areas of the minority Democratic Party met to discuss the amendments to the reform of Labour. Present at Alfredo D’Attorre and Stefano Fassina (Area reformist), but also Rosy Bindi , Goofy Civati, the chairmen of the Budget and Labor of the House Francesco Boccia (who voted Renzi at the conference) and Cesare Damiano . And yet, Vannino Chiti , Barbara Pollastrini and Paolo Fontanelli .
“For our part – explains D’Attorre – there is great willingness and confidence that we can arrive at a unified position. ” The intent, specification, is to propose a “unified solution” in the Democratic Party on the German model, with the contract protections and increasing the prediction of reinstatement in the case of unfair dismissal after the first three years. “If Renzi, however, is not available in any mediation, the background remains the need to consult our people, as a last resort,” said D’Attorre. The reference to the referendum among members of the Democratic Party which is not, however, at the time, he stressed, the agenda.
At the direction of the minority Democratic Party has asked the president of ‘ Assembly, Matthew Orfini , to put on the agenda the Stability Law . “It ‘a key piece” of the labor reform, underline Alfredo D’Attorre and Stefano Fassina at the end of a meeting in the House. In the Stability Law , they explain, you will find the resources to reform social safety nets. Resources, estimate Fassina, amounted to “at least $ 4 billion.” Former Deputy Minister of Economy has also stressed that “it is ridiculous to” explain, as he did this morning Giuliano Poletti , that “ reinstatement will remain discriminatory dismissals. Who puts in the middle of the reinstatement for the discriminators as a concession to the minority Democratic Party – said Fassina – not knows whereof he speaks: in that case the protection is provided for by the Charter of Fundamental Rights of 1948, I think anyone would question those principles. “
Article 18 of the fourth year of employment – One of the amendments provides for the same protections contained in the contract for an indefinite period for new employees with that in increasing protections provided by the Bill delegation Jobs (Jobs Act). With this amendment, therefore, would be also provided for the restores in the event of dismissal without just cause for new hires with contract safeguards increasing after 3 years of work. Basically it introduces a ‘limit’ to the validity of the new contract to protect growing in relation to the aging worker: after four years reference is made to the protection provided by the current system.
The proposed amendment – signed first Federico Fornaro – also includes “the implementation of a monitoring framework relating to unfair dismissal in order to evaluate the effectiveness and efficiency of the procedures of conciliation and judicial force even under the terms of certainty of the timing of the settlement of the dispute and, consequently, to identify any appropriate revision surgery of the same. ”
Review job responsibilities – The first amendment to the signature of Maria Cecilia Guerra and supported by 27 other senators requires that the revision of job responsibilities , including demotion , can occur in the case of “processes of reorganization, restructuring or conversion company identified on the basis of objective parameters and objectified” and that they are covered “limits the change of classification.” In addition, it is expected that the collective bargaining , also corporate or second-level “may identify additional assumptions” with respect to the review of tasks.
Shocks social – The senators Maria Cecilia Guerra , with Erica d’Adda , Maria Grazia Gatti and Federico Fornaro indicate also the need to provide prior to the reform of shock absorbers , with lots of specification of resources, and the identification of such policies, then the revision of types of contracts . The senators also ask dem that, as expected, the current text, the remote controls are possible only on the plants and not on the workers . The proposed amendment – the first signatory Erica D’Adda, supported by 31 senators – aims to add “on plants” in the principle of delegation that includes a review of the regulation of remote controls.
In amendments are required also to maintain the upper limit of 5 thousand euro earned through the system of voucher within the possible extension of the use of this type of employment relationship. At the moment the proxy provides for the “possibility of extending the use of job performance accessory for work and occasional discontinuous” without specifying a ceiling of total salary.
Finally, the amendment signed by Lucrezia Ricchiuti and supported by 30 senators that explicitly provides for the reduction of the number of contractual forms for “locate and analyze all existing forms of contract, in order to be able to assess the actual consistency with the fabric employment and the context of production nationally and internationally, in terms of simplification measures or exceeding the same type of contract. “
Sacconi:” Amendments inadmissible “ – “The amendments proposed by the minority of the Democratic Party are inadmissible for those who want to reform the labor market,” says the chairman of the Senate Committee on Labor and parliamentary Ncd, Maurizio Sacconi that the changes to the current Democratic Party “assume the permanent contract with an absurd trial period of three years without Article 18 confirming, among other things, that ‘ Article 18 is editable but little. It is a proposal meaningless because the flexibility in a three-year period is already guaranteed by the liberalization of fixed-term contracts. “
On tasks and control at a distance, then Sacconi said the amendments “only allow union agreements as the current law has already produced in 2011 but little implemented the widespread trade union resistance to flex tasks and to use technology to enable telecommuting with their channels of communication.” And finally for i voucher “do not want to allow a good babysitter to accumulate many hours with many employers also over 5000 euro per year. Not to mention the return of these ‘brave’ innovations to an unspecified and indeterminable time ever expansion of the shock absorbers. ” By the proposals of the minority Democratic Party, for Sacconi “in short, a vision emerges old ideological because it is based on persistent bias against the company. We will not be voting ever. “
->
No comments:
Post a Comment