black smoke for the election of two Constitutional Court judges by the Parliament in joint session. According to the ANSA learns from sources parliamentarians, no candidate has reached the required quorum of three fifths of the members of the Assembly, equal to 570 votes. Luciano Violante scored 518 votes; Donato Bruno 511 will serve a new vote: the thirteenth.
Luciano Violante again exceeds Donato Bruno in the vote for the Constitutional Court, but the consensus of the two drop compared to last night. The former Speaker of the House (Pd) today earned 518 votes, compared to 526 yesterday; the exponent of FI instead gets 511 votes compared to 544 yesterday. Both are under the quorum of the Assembly of 5.3, equal to 570 votes.
No quorum for the election of two lay members of the CSM: to learn how to bare the ANSA not yet finalized , the vote of the Parliament in joint session no update has reached the 514 votes needed to trigger the election (03.05 served the voters). Need a new vote.
The next session of Parliament in joint session to elect the judges of the Constitutional Court will be held Thursday at 9.30. And ‘what is learned from sources of parliamentary majority.
MEETING RENZI-BERLUSCONI – The leader of Forza Italy, Silvio Berlusconi, met at Palazzo Chigi premier Matteo Renzi. The Knight was accompanied by Gianni Letta. The meeting was also attended by the Deputy Secretary of the Democratic Party Lorenzo Guerini and Denis Verdini. The face to face was expected for days.
“ You have not talked to See and CSM if not to share the appeal of the Head of State . Groups have already pronounced and go forward with those names. ” He said the deputy secretary of the Democratic Party Lorenzo Guerini at the end of ‘ meeting between Berlusconi and Renzi .
acceleration on the reform of the electoral law with scheduling in a short time in the Senate Commission. And ‘what they have agreed – as reported by the deputy secretary Pd Lorenzo Guerini – Matteo Renzi and Silvio Berlusconi meeting at Palazzo Chigi.
MONITO OF NAPOLITANO – “The succession without final results of the voting in the Parliament in joint session for the election of lay members of the CSM and the judges of the Constitutional Court bound to happen to the two who have completed the mandate, raises serious questions. ” This was underlined by President Napolitano in a statement. If you continue to “unjustified foreclosures prevail against candidates of other political or sectarian claim to be considered eligible only candidates of their party,” as in these days to the vote on the Consult and the CSM, “the mechanism is paralyzed and same guarantee institution represented by the system of qualified quorum wears out. “
ALARM impasse ORLANDO – The Minister of Justice Orlando launches an alarm impasse in voting for members See the CSM and the and urges the Parliament to act quickly, because the reforms entail an increase in the work (among other things the renewal of several vertices of judicial offices) to the Board of Governors, which can not be stall. On the subject of same-sex unions, Orlando recorded a regulatory gap that in his opinion be rapidly eliminated. And on the issue of judges cutting holidays, explains that it is not decisive, but it contributes to a better functioning of the machine.
THE TAKING OF POSITION OF 5 STARS – “The parties to carve up CSM block the Parliament and the Constitutional Court for ten days. these are not the real problems of the country and the rooms can not be paralyzed. Rather, it is helpful at night to CSM and See , and the day you work on important measures that affect the citizens. ” This was stated by Luigi Di Maio (M5S) to TG2.
The parliamentary M5S to vote this afternoon Look for the white board will vote . And we will continue to do so, says the leader of the Senate Petrocelli at a press conference in the House, until “we do not present names credible, independent and out of politics.”
THE PRESS OF NAPOLITANO – “The succession without conclusive results of the voting in the Parliament in joint session for the election of lay members of the CSM and the judges of the Constitutional Court bound to happen to the two who have completed their term of office, raises serious questions. Which occurred similar in the past unhappy past, does not alter that gravity.’m not sure if all participants have the votes in the course clear in particular an important issue on which I wish to draw their attention. recently – and especially in the debate in the Senate on overcoming bicameralism equal – was raised by various political parties raising the issue of a quorum required by the Constitution of 1948 for the election by the parliamentary commissions to certain of constitutional significance. It was deemed necessary to the raising of such quorum after the adoption – in 1993 and 2005 – of majoritarian electoral laws and the adoption of a new (currently only approved in first reading by the Chamber), also the majority. But high quorum for such election in Parliament convergences imply strictly on the nominations and full sharing in the expression of votes among different political forces, majority and minority. Where are by any political force, or individual representatives in Parliament, and end up dominated by unjustified foreclosures against candidates of other political or sectarian claim to be considered eligible only candidates of their party, the mechanism is paralyzed and the same guarantee institution represented by the system of qualified quorum wears out and can be challenged in the opposite orientation that I first called. It therefore reflects well on this important aspect of the consequences of a protracted stalemate in the overall voting under way, which prevents the first settlement in the new CSM. “
No comments:
Post a Comment