->
At Chamber of Deputies there would be “drawers unspeakable” containing some kind of shameful secrets. And, just to prevent these drawers are opened in the name of transparency invoked, the President Laura Boldrini wanted Lucia Pagano as a new general secretary of the House . And ‘the complaint comes from the Congressman Richard Fraccaro, exponent of 5 Star Movement and Secretary of’ Bureau of the House. Fraccaro, with other colleagues grillini, starting with the Vice President of the House Luigi Di Maio, yesterday voted against the appointment of Pagano, which were opposed, among others, the Democrat Roberto Giachetti and the representative of Choice civic Stefano D’Ambruoso . In this interview with ilfattoquotidiano.it Fraccaro tells his version of how things went. “The vote yesterday,” said the deputy of the M5S, “was a blitz typical Democrat. The President Boldrini lent itself to a political calculation using old school techniques to impose its own name and prevent the name was placed under review by the public. “
What you chiedevate Movement 5 Stars?
As it was the prerogative of the Boldrini indicate the name of the new secretary general who was to be voted on by the Bureau, we asked to specify a list of candidates so that could decide according to the curriculum, the competence and experience without making political calculations or currents within the administration of the House.
But how did things go?
In recent weeks the president has called us, has called on all parties, trying to figure out if there could be a convergence. Who has also indicated the names on which she intended to pursue its proposal. Too bad that none of those names was then brought to the vote.
What were these names?
Those of the two senior officials Fabrizio Castaldi and Constantine Rizzuto . Then we were told we could not find the square because the Democratic Party was split inside. For this Boldrini postponed several times the decision that we should have taken already last December. He returned several times until you get close to the constitutional reforms. So it is presented on the last day available, saying, “my name is this, we have to decide.” The name was that of Pagano, without giving us the opportunity to study the candidacy because we do not know this person.
But for you Pagano is adequate to the role to which it is been called?
We have not had a chance to verify his story. His resume, as that of other colleagues, is online. They are all good curriculum. She has made the competition, has entered, has no publication. He made a career inside, has no experience outside. Since I do not know, we wanted to verify his story in the administration of the House. But Boldrini has not given us this opportunity. Gave us half an hour to decide in this half hour and we have only found that Pagano is the daughter of a former Head of Service of the House, the wife of a head of service of the Senate, and that is related Fioroni.
Giuseppe Fioroni, the deputy of the Democratic Party?
Yes, just like that, the husband of Pagano’s cousin Fioroni of the Democratic Party.
And this, excuse me, what does that mean?
For us there is a clear conflict of interest. We said: here you have to check before you vote, since we do not know it. The President Boldrini unfortunately we were not given this opportunity and put the question to a vote
Some of you claims that there were political maneuvers to pass the candidacy of Pagano in particular that the current Minister of Culture Dario Franceschini would be activated in favor of the new secretary of the Chamber.
We have said this thing: it’s a blitz of Franceschini for a person ….
Who told you?
We have told senior officials of the House. We were told that it is a maneuver of franceschiniani and Boldrini to put on that chair a person close to the former general secretary Ugo Zampetti, a person that guarantees substantially continuity with the old administration and especially to ensure that certain internal drawers room, drawers probably “unspeakable”, not to be opened.
Casseti unspeakable?
I remember that up to two terms is the general secretary of the Chamber had access to a credit card with no bottom and no reporting totally at his disposal
This is serious accusations and assumptions. You have evidence or are always internal officers to speak?
are always internal officers who come to tell these things.
So, according to them there would be shameful secrets, hidden in the internal practices of the House?
Yes, and must not be discovered.
And now that you what you intend to do? How will you move after this complaint of “drawers unspeakable” and practices that should not be discovered?
We plan to continue to try to open these drawers despite the attempt to cover the whole. We want to embarrass the President Boldrini and administration asking more and more transparency and asking to open more and more drawers.
->
No comments:
Post a Comment