Wednesday, February 25, 2015

Anti-corruption bill, increase the penalties. But the norm creates imbalances – The Century of Italy

Anti-corruption bill, increase the penalties. But the norm creates imbalances – The Century of Italy

 
 
 

In the Senate Judiciary Committee approved a government amendment to anti corruption bill and increases the penalties , minimum and maximum, for the crime of corruption committed by public officials. Immediately the spot of Renzi via twitter: “Before the Authority entrusted to Canton, then the commissioners with the decree Madia. Now we increase the penalties for corrupt #lavoltabuona. “



DDL anti-corruption blitz government

This represents a shift from four to six and eight to ten years. A blitz of the government, according to Forza Italy and New Centre-Right . The rush to Renzi, the mania of “ stop and go ” alter the entire structure of sanctions, according to the chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee Francis Nitto Palma , since the ‘rapporteur’s amendment expected to increase up to ten years, the same sentence, but left intact the minimum sentence currently provided by the Criminal Code. In this way – he said – you risk ‘l’ irrationality of the whole system of sanctions for the offenses in the anti-corruption bill. ” The penalty for corruption would become, in fact, “more important than that for the corruption in judicial proceedings.”



Obstruction of Government

A Senate consideration of the bill anti- Corruption continues to sob, and another between an interruption. Shortly after the amendment so the government, the Commission’s work was immediately interrupted. The measure has, in fact, made it unbalanced the whole set of sanctions. “If the goal is to make a good law, it must be a systematic review of the penis – said Ciro Falanga , the blue component of the Senate Judiciary Committee – whether on the contrary, the goal is simply to fire the measure at a specific time, whatever it is , this can only see Forza Italy in place of energetic opposition. ” The government Renzi seems willing to submit the amendment on false accounting directly in plenary and in committee. In this regard, according to Palma, you have to understand how long it takes to the rapporteur to review the whole system of sanctions: “If the government had thought of before, and had not only limited to the spot” six to ten “would have been better.” Even Senator Lucio Malan blue stigmatizes the behavior of the government accusing it of filibuster on false accounting.

(Visited 43 times, 43 visits today)


 

LikeTweet

No comments:

Post a Comment