Rai, elected seven members of the board The Democratic Party is split on the candidates – AGI – Agenzia Journalistic Italy

22:18 August 4, 2015

(AGI) – Rome, Aug. 4 – The Supervisory Board of RAI voted the seven members of the board of Viale Mazzini within its competence. But it ‘s been a vote that marked yet a fracture within the Democratic Party: the internal majority proposed a block of names and’ past, while the minority dem proposed a name – that of Ferruccio de Bortoli – which is not ‘ past, or to the former director of Corsera there were sufficient votes to be elected or at least ’cause you went to a second round of voting. Instead makes a hit, the center ’cause in the end you end up with two components, rather than’ the only budgeted. The seven are appointed Carlo Freccero, proposed by M5S and Sel, who got six votes; thus blocking the PD with Guelph Guelph (six votes for him), Rita Borioni (5), Franco Siddi (5); then there ‘Paolo Messa, a candidate from the centrist (4 votes); Arturo Diaconale (5 votes) and Giancarlo Mazzuca (4), center. Now expects to know the other two names – pertaining to the government – to complete the new Board Rai, elected but ‘once again with the Gasparri law. The final vote and ‘scheduled for Thursday’ (the possibility of a vote tomorrow evening and ‘only on paper, according to the succession of the work of the Board and then the Board of Supervision). Matthew Orfini, Democratic Party chairman, said at the end of the work of the Committee, that “minority and ‘accustomed to exercise vetoes but strangely and’ presented with a dry name, that of De Bortoli”. On the other hand, Michele Gotor, the minority Democratic Party, claimed “there ‘was vetoed on de Bortoli we judge wrong and we embittered. The Democratic Party must give indications of high-profile and instead and’ lost this opportunity.” Figure “would have brought honor to the Democratic Party, the political proposal of the Government and the RAI.” The chairman of the Supervisory Board, Robert Fico, in a press conference going down ‘heavy’ Renzi and ‘a retired clown: he says one thing and does another. The moment says he wants to see an independent Rai, forces his Representatives vote to people who are in the party. ” He adds “the framework and ‘bleak, there are people on the Board who must respond to a specific intention. It’ started the campaign and must lock up future appointments to the newspapers Rai. We are a movement for free, culturally free, and we can do and give their best. Renzi says ‘get rid Rai parties’, and then we end the appointments of family friends, spin doctors, assistants parties “. Fico notes that “Renzi for the press conference and ‘a showcase, then return to deceive Italians in the secret rooms. And from Japan a little’ talk of southern Italy and a bit ‘of the Rai …”. As for Freccero, as proposed by the M5S and voted for Fico ‘and’ a heritage of professionalism ‘that we provide. This means an independent public service. The reform law that the Democratic Party led in the Senate and’ still a Gasparri 2.0 … And worse under the new law (if it was already ‘executive, ed) there would be no chance’ to bring in someone like Freccero Board “. And the next president, “Renzi should do as timely and transparent”, before the vote on Thursday ‘, and this means in a serious dialogue. I do not think that will come ‘this great name. “Criticism for how and’ proceeded arrived dall’Usigrai:” The division and ‘served. As in the worst traditions of party politics, in the middle of August and there is’ quick to divide the seats of Rai. It ‘s not a question of names, of this or that adviser. It ‘a matter of method. It used by those who had promised to scrap the past. “For the UsigRai, the appointment and ‘proceeded” with the sling of the parties, without any kind of discussion on the mandate of the new vertex, and then on the profiles needed to ferry towards future the most ‘great company culture and information of the country, it’ on the funding. “And for the general secretary of FNSI, Raffaele Lorusso,” the judgment method of the appointment of the new Board of RAI remains negative. You can not ‘not confirm what was already’ said the day before, the method and ‘wrong and likely to produce dangerous consequences for the future of Rai and the public service broadcaster “. (AGI).