Thursday, June 16, 2016

D’Alema: “Frame look for a scapegoat, made by the house organ of the Nazarene Party” – The Daily

“This is a real frame against me , the result of the fact that they are looking for a scapegoat because they are afraid, Sunday, very disappointing compared to expectations . It is a blatant maneuver by what is actually a house organ of the Party of the Nazarene. ” After denial comes the counterattack. From the columns La Stampa , Massimo D’Alema back on serious battle within the Democratic Party between him and the leaders triggered by the Republic a signing Goffredo De Marchis . According to the journalist, the former prime minister would be ready to vote on the ballot on Sunday in Rome, the candidate of the Movement 5 Stars Virginia Rays instead of the democratic Roberto Giachetti . And who in order to “send home Renzi – he said – I would be willing to vote also Lucifer “. Not only. In a new paper, De Marchis says that former Democratic Party chairman phoned critic Montanari art to persuade him to enter into any pentastellata come.

On the other hand Alema denied point-by-point reconstruction the newspaper founded by Eugenio Scalfari (instead still confirmed today by Fochetti Largo journalist), behind which sees a clear political strategy. The former prime minister also resize the sentence with respect to the October vote: “If he wins the yes to the referendum , make the split; if it wins no, we recover the party. ” The “leader Maximo” tells in detail how things went to the Deputy Director of the Turin daily, Federico Geremicca . “The incident in question took place at the end of a seminar on the democracy of twenty years, then at the end of the work carried out between us and the association Magna Carta . When the conference is over – says the former president of the Council – we paused for the greetings on the landing and Quagliariello has asked John Orsini how he would vote on the constitutional referendum October. Orsina said they would vote yes and Quagliariello then replied that he – instead – would have voted no. ” For his part D’Alema he recalls having stated “that in case of victory of yes, Renzi would drive us from the party. But it was clearly a beat , not a political statement. In addition, I have never talked about the Rays. For this reason I say that is a frame . Indeed, it is – as I have already explained – the pure junk from a newspaper that loses readers, as we are losing voters of the Democratic Party. ” Also Quagliariello , interviewed by ‘ Huffington Post , admits that there was an exchange of words with D’Alema, a “curtain” where “are no shortage of hyperbole and mutual jocular invective “, but” nothing more “.

Pure invention also regard to the phrase” I would vote Lucifer just to send home Renzi “. “I never said the word Lucifer, because it is a term that is not in my vocabulary: if anything, I would have said Beelzebub. But the point is that the jokes are not political statements: if I wanted to make a political statement I would have known it. ” According to D’Alema whole affair “demonstrates and confirms the level of degradation of Italian journalism. De Marchis, the author of ‘Republic’, he never called me, phoned Massimo Bray , which has unequivocally said that attribuitemi sentences were not true. Write the same was therefore a lie , whose principals who wants to use me as a scapegoat. ” “I was even accused of having gone in Apulia to hold meetings for plotting who knows what, but there are actually went to hold rallies of the Democratic Party. You can write – said D’Alema – that it is just a fabrication by those who, fearing the worst for Sunday’s balloting is trying to time a person to blame. “

Far from setting rather than He told today by the Republic. The political journalist De Marchis, author of “offending”, confirms the authenticity of his background and in a new piece provides other evidence in support of its reconstruction. “In the last few weeks – writes De Marchis – there are two issues on which D’Alema has expressed, reasoning with colleagues, professors and intellectuals who met during election rounds and the appointments of its Foundation”. According to the journalist, D’Alema, during a private meeting with his loyalists in Bari three days ago at his Foundation, has expressed its intention to create committees for the “no” to the referendum on Sunday in order to create their own space self left with the goal of “dropping Renzi at any cost because the reform is a mess, it is a presidential system masked and without counterweight.” Also according to the newspaper directed by Mario Calabresi , the former prime minister said he would vote for the Rays in the runoff on Sunday in Rome because “it is crucial the Renzi defeat in Milan and Rome. Just so you can reconstruct a field of the center “. This reasoning did D’Alema according to De Marchis, which adds a backstory. The former premier “phoned twice to art critic Tomaso Montanari to try to convince him to accept the offer of the Movement 5 Stars: do the councilor for culture in the junta Rays. The council, in essence, was to side with the grillini. But, at the end Montanari, a student of Salvatore Settis , declined the invitation and was pulled out of the totonomi for Capitol . “

->

LikeTweet

No comments:

Post a Comment