‘ Italicum is born and already it is unknown whether and how shall live. The Election Law enter into force in a few hours, at midnight on July 1, but the local elections won by M5s and lost by pd (with a center-pleasure dose) had the effect of the rewind button. Start over the whole discussion of quotas, prizes, preferences and so on. As if the three steps between Camera and Senate to get final approval had never occurred. Of course, the cards are reshuffled. It remains the guerrillas in the Democratic Party between renziani and the rest of the party, but for example, Luigi Di Maio , Five Star Movement, writes on facebook that than changes to the electoral law “priorities are other”, while in full he spoke of the debate before approval of a law “pro corruption” because it was like the porcellum . Or, on the other hand, Angelino Alfano that for weeks is developing a way to get to change the electoral reform that his party helped to seal in parliamentary procedures. In this direction it would be followed by none other than franceschiniani and this would really be the first real crack in front renziano. Less surprising is the position of the left of the Democratic Party – part of which did not vote the law – who returns to ringalluzzirsi after the Italian Left motion that will be debated in September (although the constitutionality and not on the merits). For now, those who resist – despite the background of the newspapers by the contradictory tones every day – is the President of the Council Matteo Renzi : “They write to me: ‘Do not you try to change the Italicum …’. To me you say? “He cut short during his #matteorisponde by night from Palazzo Chigi.
At this position around the renziano leadership seems compact:” With the Italicum – tells the Courier della Sera the leader of the House Ettore Rosato – we have built a solid system, which guarantees the governability and representation and that solves those problems that even today we can see again in Spain. That said, we never denied the dialogue. ” And coincidentally uses the same words of Di Maio: “The priorities of the country” are “other, simplification, to combat unemployment, the fight against poverty.” The same prudence of the group leader in the Senate Luigi Zanda , also of undoubted faith: “It would be the first time you change an untested electoral law.”
The restart of the juke box statements on the electoral law is mainly about the left of the Democratic party and Italian left , the group that filed the motion on the constitutionality dell’Italicum which will be discussed in September. Miguel Gotor , for example, do not miss the turn even this around and do not settle for generic changes: the law should be changed right, wrong, she says. “Why – adds talking to Republic – between cosmetics and a law that ensures greater representation really prefer the second way.” The motion is not enough: “It’s up to Renzi take the initiative.”
Among the TopClass attitudes are different. Danilo Toninelli , the man of the reforms in the House, finds the dictionary once to wipe out any misunderstanding: “the Italicum today we could to win – he says – but would lose democracy and for that we want to bring it down.” And yet what is the way to “bring it down”? Vote no in the referendum because the Italicum “can not be changed: we want a new electoral law and ask the Democratic Party to evaluate our proposal. And we will also be presenting a motion, knowing that the motions in Parliament have little value. ” Alessandro Di Battista tweet: “Until M5S victories in Rome and Turin #Italicum was the world’s best law (for us it sucks). Renzi now ready to change it. Scoundrels! “. The location of the Cinquestelle, in short, looks the same as always: either their proposed electoral law, or else it is all garbage, including Italicum.
The change in demand is currently the introduction of majority of the premium to the coalition and not to the list. He asks Forza Italy and this is very well known because Silvio Berlusconi want to join the front of the center with Lega Nord and Brothers of Italy because otherwise none of the three parties has hope of playing any role Policies. But now it also asks Popular Area – key segment of the majority – and the idea is in fact shared also by the slice renziani following the minister Dario Franceschini . The real point of all this discussion is that any changes you decide to do, serve in parliament votes: those who want to achieve them, in short, observes renziano Andrea Marcucci , has to find a majority that votes in Parliament. And on the first lap it was not easy at all.
Then there is the political reflection, though. Here also fits the advice of an extra-parliamentary renziano, the constitutionalist Stefano Ceccanti , a former Democratic senator: “There are no technical time to change an electoral law before the constitutional referendum of autumn: and if Renzi win, many things will change … – declares the Print – But the fund would seem suicidal ask to change an electoral law because are you afraid of the Five Star . A position that would define ‘sconfittistica’. Do not hold up in front of the country. ” Renzi seems to share this view. For now.
->
No comments:
Post a Comment