Italicum, in September in court a motion is to review the law – Il Sole 24 Ore

The House of the Chamber will vote in September a motion on the constitutionality of the new electoral law, the so-called ‘Italicum’, presented by the Italian Left.
This was established by the Conference of the House leaders. On the revision of the law, he noted the leader Arturo Scotto at the end of the conference of presidents of the Chamber of Deputies groups, “there is an undercurrent debate and request the Parliament to express itself before the Consulta.” The stated aim is to express Parliament on “clearly unconstitutional points” refer, on which you will then pronounce the Consulta.

Italicum, the narrow way of Renzi Di Maio: boomerang change

For This law is an electoral Counter
In the premise of the motion, signed by deputies members of the Italian Left group, and before signing Arturo Scotto parent, it is emphasized that it is “quite clear that Parliament, well before the pronouncement of CorteCostituzionale, acts on the approved reform, eliminating those blatant unconstitutional defects that make the 52 of the law of 2015 a real counter-election meant, in the opinion of the signatories of this guideline, to provoke a new pronunciation of illegality on the part of the consultation. “

All against Italicum, and renziani “reflect”

The vices highlighted daiparlamentari the Italian Left
Among the “flaws” raised the motion It refers to the judgment of the consultation on porcellum stressing that Italicum essentially reoccur them. The two issues highlighted in the text are the “unequal discharge of the vote, and in direct violation of the dates by the enormous majority of the premium assigned rating” and “the lack of provision of appropriate mechanisms to allow citizens to impact on the election of the representatives’ . The first aspect, it says in the motion, “This is grossly nell’Italicum especially in relation to the case where no list obtains at least 40% in the first round”, while in relation to the second aspect of the motion looks as nell’Italicum, albeit preferences “will be admitted, however, provide leaders stuck” with preferential voting “relegated to a subordinate role compared to the leaders, concerned solely the result will list that will win the prize.”

© All rights reserved