Friday, December 26, 2014

Jobs Act, the Democratic Party split. Ncd: ‘A little courage’. CGIL, ‘It’s ok for a … – Quotidiano.net

Jobs Act, the Democratic Party split. Ncd: 'A little courage'. CGIL, 'It's ok for a … – Quotidiano.net

Rome, December 26, 2014 – E ‘clash on Jobs Act after the decrees issued by the Council of Ministers on’ protections growing ‘.

“It could be worse, could be raining.” Alfredo On Attorre paraphrase a famous line from Frenkenstein Jr., comic masterpiece of Mel Brooks to say that no, the decrees of the Jobs Act do not go at all in the right direction, that the “judgment is negative”, but that could have been worse. There was no rain, in short, because they were saved replenishment in case of disciplinary dismissal. This is thanks to the work done in committee in the House, hard beyond all expectations, since the reinstatement for layoffs disciplinary “seemed taken for granted as early as September.”

But it is very little compared to the many negative voices included in the Jobs Act. On Attorre not attack the actions of the government with the vehemence of Stefano Fassina – that says “Renzi follows the agenda of the Troika” – or Pippo Civati ​​for which, under the tree, “Santa Claus did find a bad gift to the workers. ” It starts with the failure to extend protections to workers, the so-called safeguards growing: for Civati ​​it is just reduced protections and even D’Attorre does not see “any real extension of protections for precarious, given the level of resources provided totally unsatisfactory for this purpose in the law of stability. “

Even sull’annunciato thinning jungle contractual” I think that the outcome is rather disappointing: the state, the Jobs Act is reduced to a partial abolition of Article 18 and greater ease for companies to lay off. ” And ‘the deputy secretary of the Democratic Party, Lorenzo Guerini, to try to make a point to domestic disputes stressing that the Jobs Act there are “no winners or losers” and that no use “exasperate personalism “as it is to win the chance to create jobs.” Meanwhile, however, the President of the Labour Commission of the Democratic Party, Cesare Damiano, has already announced the intention of wanting to continue to work to correct the Jobs Act in its parts most critical . Starting with the collective redundancies. Very critical also Ncd, government ally of the Democratic Party who was refused the proposal of the leader in the Senat e Maurizio Sacconi, to eliminate altogether the possibility of reinstatement. This is enough to make the Jobs Act “ a lost opportunity “, in the opinion of neocentristi, according to which the draft decree delegate is certainly a step forward in comparison with the regulation in force, but in comparison with the needs of the growth is not likely to give a real boost to business conduct, “said Sacconi, who added” lacked the courage of great choices. “

But from right and left is rebadged as the capacity to influence the actions of the government. The leader of the Democratic Party in the House, Robert Hope, coins a hashtag on Twitter, #SacconiBuonNatale, to underline the defeat of alfaniani. From the right, however, is Mattinale, house organ of FI in the House, to emphasize that the “arm dell’Ncd was in no time bent by the dictates of the CGIL. ” “Ncd pathetic on Article 18: Sacconi irate to defeat, Schifani pretends victory, Quagliariello media, Cicchitto sbarella, pathetic,” wrote on Twitter Sen. Gasparri.

And then there are the trade unions: the CGIL The new measures give “the green light to companies to lay off workers on a discretionary individual and groups of workers. Rather than the Copernican revolution, we are at a blank proxy to companies that are contracted growth. ” He added: “These measures affecting collective and individual rights.” Dura also UIL: according Carmelo Barbagallo, it’s time to start “a common path with the CGIL and CISL.” Even the CISL, only one not to have gone on strike against the Jobs Act, has not spared observations: “The text of the Government on the Jobs Act is still improved, in particular as regards the rules on collective redundancies”.

LikeTweet

No comments:

Post a Comment