Episodes insufficient – supports the National Commission of the Democratic Party guarantee – to subvert the people’s will. Valente: “We work together for the good of Naples”
Share
” also reflect in these days of Easter holidays on how to proceed in each case a battle for Napoli: ethical, civil and political “. He writes it on Facebook Antonio Bassolino, commenting on the decision of the Democratic National Guarantee Board to reject his appeal against the result of the primary center of 6 March in Naples.
Valeria Valente, a candidate for mayor, meanwhile, after the decision says “I appeal to all the other competitors of the primaries, from Bassolino, so that we can work together for the center to guide the city, in the exclusive interest of Naples.”
The President of the Commission Gianni Dal Moro reported that the decision was passed unanimously. Dal Moro explained that immediately after the action was brought by Bassolino, “the Commission requested documents, the Regulations of the primaries, the question of participation by Bassolino with the acceptance of the Regulation, up to the seats verbal” .
Franco Vazio, instructor of the Committee reported that they “come to a declaration of incompetence and thus rejecting” instance Bassolino. In fact, the Regulations of the primaries, accepted by Bassolino when submitting their application, provided “a unique instance guarantee institution to settle disputes” represented by the same organizing committee. Moreover primary Neapolitan were coalition, and the organizing committee of the primary “is a body part by more parties and not only by the Democratic Party.”
This is why the National Commission of the Democratic Party guarantee is “incompetent” and It dismissed the appeal “for the same reason rejected the appeal after the primaries in Liguria”. However, the Commission “has not been limited to a decision on the form and ritual – explained Vazio – but also on the merits” of the action, whose motivations are “unfounded.”
To do this committee responsible this has held the administrative case law of normal elections. In fact the seats whose results are contested, “as shown by video, it is just a few cases, five, and not hundreds.” So the number of contested votes would not therefore call into question the outcome, not exceeding the so-called “principle of resistance.” Moreover, these episodes should be tested, while “not it is mentioned in the minutes of the seats, though in them there were representatives of the Election Committee of Bassolino, who then did not contest any irregolaritò inside or outside the polling stations.” “In the past, other complaints were from the minutes of the polling
As for the invitation to vote Valente, made outside a polling station by a militant, denounced as a “disturbance” by Bassolino, ” in administrative justice there is no case that has led to the cancellation of the polling result. the misconduct are prosecuted individually, and that is what can make the local committee if it is a writing to the Democratic Party. “
Finally, there is the episode of the contribution of one euro required to participate in the primaries, provided to some voters by a local militant. In general “is a delicate matter,” the question whether the payment of the contribution, however small, is completely impediment to participation; but in any case “it is unreasonable to consider illegitimate the vote of a citizen whose contribution was paid generously by an acquaintance.”
No comments:
Post a Comment