“How pitiful, or Jupiter, and all of you, or gods, become a slave of a master who does not has wisdom … Here he walks behind a blind, doing the opposite of what he would agree to do. Because we should be, we see, to lead the blind … Well, there is no danger that I keep silent, if you do not tell me a good time because we follow this man, or master. ” It is what Aristophanes made to say Karion in “Pluto” comedy. And, “incredibly,” Chremylos replied: “In clear terms, the god told me to put me in the ribs of the first that I met him, coming out.”
Not even such an absurd explanation could clarify the mysterious reason for which Silvio Berlusconi was convinced that Stefano Parisi is the man of Providence to whom to entrust to revive his party, then come back to win the center-right. It is possible that, in a season with strong leadership deficit, personality modest political caliber can project a ‘higher picture of their actual political level. Or, that the company’s path of ‘ former CEO of Fastweb still works as a magnet of monomania former Knight, who always does not like what he knows of the profession “political”. Matteo Salvini and Giorgia Meloni they know something. Even socialist roots and membership “Milanese” Parisi, like Berlusconi for intuitive reasons: the recall a golden age for his business interests at the time of the “Milan to drink” and Italy craxiana. All these ingredients that actually owns Parisi – along with a good foundation of relationships and discreet way to look out on television – have convinced the leaders of Forza Italy to focus on him to restore the enamel to the blues and to bless as his ideal candidate for the premiership.
With the appointment of Parisi, Berlusconi has discouraged its leadership: advancing the company-party
which – as evidence the general uprising against the “appointment” in FI – has the clear meaning of a blatant distrust of Berlusconi against his leadership. Which, in fact, it has rebelled. Obviously, in the form and manner in which it can be allowed in a company-party “form” policy to which – especially from the days when B. was admitted to the San Raffaele – it seems to march sent what was the majority party of the Italian center-right. Parisi that is very pleasing to Confalonieri, Letta and Ghedini and indigestible to almost all the political table where Toti, Brunette and Romans, is the consequence of this dynamic. Which, in the short term, it could lead to open conflict, or, according to some, in a split, which would suffer yet another Berlusconi’s world. Where, as and when the physical condition of the old leader will show ailments and falls – inevitable with age – it is not difficult to foresee a growing division between “political” and “business”, with different perspectives and interests, intended to spread apart . The newcomer Parisi has already positioned among the latter.
The question is, the manager is the right person to give polish to Berlusconi and even to make the anti-Renzi at the next general?
C ‘ it is to be doubted. Very. Meanwhile – mandatory observe it – recently the political decline of Berlusconi produces choices intuitu personae , the wrong standard, where once were the appropriate norm. This causes some impression of the three candidates selected by the former President of the Council to make the mayor in Milan, Rome and Naples, no one could make it. The results tell you selected persons deemed inadequate by the voters. The first is just Parisi under the Madonnina. Followed by Marchini in the Capital and Lettieri in Naples. All three defeated. All three moderates. All three business men. All three liberals. All three very “European”. All three losers.
The former CEO of Fastweb is a man of the past with old ideas: the laying on of hands does not work
The laying on of hands by Berlusconi it is not dropped on the right heads. The ritual did not work. It does not work anymore for some time. The fact that the former general director of Confindustria has been identified by former Knight, is no longer a guarantee of secret “knowledge”, but an expression of tarnished skills, out of the political times we live in. And that
Parisi has lost room, makes an unsuccessful man who then can not fulfill, even in terms of image and communication, the question of political revenge and novelties which the Italian center-right would like to reply.
Parisi is a man of past. Not so much because it is “ex everything” and had roles in governments and institutions which date back to archeology policy, where those who served – Ciampi, De Michelis, Amato – rest for a long time. It is his proposal “popular liberal policy” that gives off unpleasant odors of stale. Ideas from old attic, new and attractive when the Italian and European thirties today were not yet born and the world rested firmly on the solid bipolar lintel of two political families – conservatives and progressives – and the only thought of unlimited confidence in advancing linear history of men and peoples. A vision put into crisis by restlessness and changes of such populism are making wearers. This change of season does not seem to be warned Parisi who still speaks the language, not the political elites planted with the News feet, but the people who still believe in the blazon of those coming from businesses and universities; and that of labor, immigration, Europe, international terrorism – to talk about issues that contemporary agenda arises in public discourse – borders on banality or remains silent.
Together observation that say “I did not win, but I It demonstrated that our deployment was the bearer of a culture of government that deserves to be articulated at the national level as a political language and content platform “, collides with an obvious consideration: if the culture of government the citizens of a large has not convinced European metropolis which is Milan – delivering a crushing defeat to center-right politics in a city where it is strong and has already ruled – why should it be proposed as a winning recipe to all Italians, even as a candidate for prime minister of the government program? A contradiction that the former number one of Fastweb – now promoted by former political consultant Knight – do not have it done so far to dissolve. Also because the center is maturing more and more the “Republican” culture of choices from the bottom instead of the transfer of authority from above, no longer accepted. That does not produce any magical effect: only political mistakes of men and things.
No comments:
Post a Comment