Parisi-Salvini, is breaking. Forza Italy seethes. Help to Renzi Berlusconi – Affaritaliani.it

->

 After the words of Parisi of Le Pen and “extremists” the divorce between Berlusconi and Salvini appear granted unless it is a new “auction” to renumber the political weight of the forces.
Parisi has been clear: “I had a dual mandate from the President: FI drive and make a liberal center – the popular”; Salvini has suffered repeated what he had already said: Parisi could be a good mayor, a hole rattoppatore but no more; national politics is another.

 In all this Toti plays the part of an honest girl seduced and abandoned by the usual “scoundrel” fascinating.

At this point, the scenario that goes drawing is a kind of “Romanization” of the center – right National (indeed widely expected after the outcome of the municipal capital) with a clear separation between wing liberal – moderate popular and extreme wing, Lepenist that could also look again at Casa Pound especially in a global scenario of revenge of populist forces .

 The scenario is clear but with these choices, the center – right is destined to disappear from the political scene for an obvious reason, the same as the chorus sang in the movie Captain America: “United we win separate you lose”; Roma docet.

 So it’s difficult to go to the Policies with a Italicum changed by the vote to the coalition and not to the list without being united; it is for this consideration that the current scenario is more tactical than strategic.

 The other strange point of Parisi’s speeches is that Renzi should remain in government even if the referendum goes wrong; which naturally caused resentment in mid Forza Italy and the whole of Italy Fratelli League.

 One wonders: but what’s underneath?

 Two possibilities: a deep unpreparedness to handle the elections and therefore the need to point directly to the 2018 to reorganize or worse a “help” to Renzi in exchange for a favorable law on former Knight industries, as is clearly stated Salvini .

 In each of these cases it is not clear why a militant efforts should be made to the referendum for the “no”, since the result would be the same as the “yes.”

->