this Is the first time that happens. Even when he was in the government of Silvio Berlusconi,Anm had defected the opening of the'the judicial year. Instead, today, the national association of magistrates said that there will be no ceremony scheduled for the 26th of January, in the Supreme court, when it held a press conference in their headquarters at the palace of justice; nor will participate in the ceremonies, scheduled for Saturday 28, in the courts of Appeal in the course of which a representative will read a document. Nothing to do with the reform of the criminal, but as established the steering Committee and the central "non-fulfil ment of the political commitments assumed by the government on the pensions and transfers of the judiciary". The ceremonial of the inauguration of the judicial year at the Supreme court does not expect an intervention of the representatives of the Anm, but the leaders of the Association take place in the aula magna. In the past years, various initiatives symbolic had been taken in the ceremonies in the districts, but not an absence.
in A unanimous decision that "in the decree “milleproroghe” approved this morning the Government has not taken any corrective action to the dl 168/2016 nor on the side of pensions and of the deadline for entitlement transfers, even for the magistrates, young people." The first consequence is that they do know weeks the robes that already on the 29th of December, they protested, that by December 31, "a number of my colleagues will be placed at rest, going to degrade the dramatic shortage of organic, with the awareness of being discriminated against and have suffered the consequences of an inexplicable rule that has established, in a conflict with the Constitution, and with the reality of the various Districts, that some of the judicial offices are more important than others and who suffer from the difficulties of the judicial system more than others. We can not emphasize that the choice of today’s Executive is not held to nothing in the account of the political commitments assumed by the Government and in an official way by the minister of Justice". And Orlando, two days after he had responded that it would intervene on the issue of retirement age in the ddl penalty. Node thereof, and in particular, the so-called "standard Canzio", commissioned by the former government Renzi in the past few months to delay the withdrawal from work of 14 judges to the apex of the Court of Cassation, Council of State and Court of Accounts. An intervention justified by the objective not to create at the end of the year lacks in the highest judicial offices of our legal system, but which has been read by the Anm as a discrimination between togas. And that had provoked the reaction of the opposition in Parliament and many a stomach ache on the inside of the Pd.
It was also already convened a further steering committee central to the 18th of February in which to assess any further initiatives before the conversion into law of the “Milleproroghe”. In the morning, when the president of the Anm Piercamillo Davigo had said that the government had not complied with the commitments and that the association is prepared to respond to the minister of Justice, Andrea Orlando, to which he responded: "I respect the discussion of the Anm and reiterate the availability to the dialogue, the fact that by the “Milleproroghe” are not arrived answers does not mean that they should not arrive: on some we are working on, on the other there is a reflection. When the Anm takes are available for a comparison, in order to prevent the opening of the years, courts, that are important moments for the entire jurisdiction and not to the government, to discharge tension, if you want to solve d ifferently." The negotiations of the executive of the Anm with the minister of Justice and chairman of the Board were evident in the effort put in writing to bring the age of retirement, albeit temporarily, all for judges at age 72 and bring back the constraint of the permanence of the magistrates of the first appointment from four to three years. The strike at the moment seems not an option. Davigo has addressed an appeal to unity: "Caution and not to sacrifice in the name of a single group in the interest of the judiciary. I want to claim the sacrifices that we made, me and my group, in the name of unity" and reiterated the opposition to the strike".
