WARSAW – No majority to change the electoral law, which is good as it is, but it changes, however, are faculties of Parliament. The stresses from Warsaw, where for the NATO summit, the Prime Minister, Matteo Renzi that, at a distance, responding to statements by the president of the group Espresso, Carlo De Benedetti, and feeds the hopes of the opposite of those in favor a reform of the electoral law.
De Benedetti, interviewed by Corriere della Sera said he hopes “not to be compelled to vote no. The reform has many positive aspects. But if l ‘ italicum does not change, I will express my opposition. For this I hope that the Consultation intervene. Or that the changes before Renzi. “
good Law . “The Italicum is a good electoral law, I’ve always said. And not being on this referendum do not see how we can continue to connect to the constitutional referendum,” replied the prime minister.
Then the passage Dem left considers key in the prime minister’s statements: “on the electoral law do not open my mouth more, it is a theme in the availability of Parliament”. But, he goes on the prime minister, “it seems to me not to see a majority” for a different electoral law. “The Mattarellum? When it was proposed there were no numbers,” he added.
Gianni Cuperlo, Left Dem leader, why remarked: “On the electoral law have said in very difficult times that the current one is not going to work. I see that the Prime Minister shall refer the matter in the hands of Parliament. for me this is good news. “
The answer to De Benedetti. “De Benedetti is also the interesting reflections on the risk that they may win other political forces on the ballot, but it is a risk that lies in the democratic game,” noted the Prime Minister, that from now on no longer wants to talk argument: “I believe the Italicum a very good law because it gives people the opportunity to find out who wins and who loses, said this falls silent release of the Prime Minister on the electoral law.”
SHEET Here’s how the electoral law / INFOGRAPHIC
Referendum has nothing to do. once again and, if possible, with greater decision, the prime minister stressed the distance between the referendum and the election law: “Yesterday – he says – I spoke with the prime Minister of Albania following the Italian policy and asked me ‘when you make referendum on the electoral law? ‘. And I said:’ The referendum is not on the electoral law ‘. I see great discussion in the press and in the political class, but the referendum is on the other. I feel a moral responsibility to remember that the referendum is the number of parliamentarians, about the end of bicameralism perfect, not sull’Italicum. “
Then states:” The electoral law, if there are numbers, one of the You can simply change with parliamentary procedure. The constitutional reform process has a much longer and more complex so it is conceivable that, where there is no constitutional reform, it will be very hard we can get our hands for a few decades. This is the scenario. “
Hypothesis unpacking . No trouble, for the president of the Council to accept the separation of the questions:” The unpacking is beyond our control, such as the date . If the Supreme Court or the Constitutional Court will give another judgment, we will not have any problem. The referendum is crucial to the future of the country. I do not mind the morning to the evening of reforms, but many issues such as the European ones, today is Italy asking all’Eruopa to change tack on some issues. “For Cuperlo a chance to unpack the referendum” is based on topics be taken into account. “
Brunetta:” De Benedetti ditching the prime minister. “ You see the intervention of De Benedetti” a hammer blow to the hopes of Renzi to be the ‘ new man that will change Italy, “the leader of Forza Italy in the House, Renato Brunetta.” the engineer Carlo De Benedetti, in the shoes of the new Gianni Agnelli, at the crossroads of financial and media power, nationally and internationally, “ditching the premier .
“he has not changed, the reproaches De Benedetti. The constitutional reform is indigestible, in conjunction with the election law creates disasters. Paternally Renzi proposes to change the electoral law, well aware that envisage this eventuality is worse than a ‘no’ dry, because it dismantles Renzi, removes an essential paper that brings down the house of cards put on in these two and a half years by the Florentine . In fact Renzi has played all over himself, identifying himself in his Koran as a block of marble, which does not even tolerate a filing, it would be like amputating a part of his ego.Improponibile “he added.
” today the fact that pairs accept, through the thoughtful words of Woods and Guerini, modifications or spacchettamenti equates to defuse its driving force, a radiation from himself and from his legendary storytelling, “says Brunette.
No comments:
Post a Comment