Renzi with Italicum risks becoming” the Fassino of Italy, “he told the” Courier “Carlo De Benedetti . Are studying countermeasures, President Ettore Rosato?
“Tying the dell’Italicum effects in a turn of Administrative would be a mistake. Which is not to say do not think carefully, even on things that De Benedetti says. “
If you do not change the Italicum, the card “number 1″ of the Democratic Party will vote no in the referendum.
“judgment on constitutional reform can not be influenced by others. The current text of the Constitution has survived many different election laws, some good and some bad as the Mattarellum like Porcellum. The reform that we endorse is aseptic compared to the electoral law. And so there adombrerei the debate on this very important content with the discussion, while legitimate, on the electoral law. “
Do not fear that the ballot win the M5S?
“usually those who have lost fewer votes, not who has the electoral law less convenient. I am still of the opinion that the Italicum guarantee governability and representation. It is the fruit of a difficult mediation, which has given Italy an electoral law after a very long inability of Parliament to make a different from Porcellum. “
in relying on Parliament, Renzi is left open all the roads?
” does what should a prime minister and a leader. Keeps the doors open to the things that you can do, with realism and a sense of responsibility. “
According to the survey of the “ Courier ‘, the group she chaired gets a strong push to change the Italicum …
” as you can see even from that data there, not enough to want to change, you have to find a sufficient majority to change it and where all are in the same direction. “
Franceschini was the first to seek to change the Italicum, worries that a part of the group responds to the Minister of Culture?
“the first was Bersani. Franceschini has collected an existing sensitivity, however, postponing until after the referendum. “
Do not it is that you, President, has lost control of the parliamentary group?
“Absolutely not. But then I claim our abnormalities. Among us there is a discussion, by the other parties is rather the expulsion “.
wait for the Consulta, or wait for the referendum?
” also tells us today that Forza Italy does not want to change the Italicum before the referendum. I think that, after the consultation, that the electoral law is a discussion that should be kept open, being careful not to make controversy and academy, but of ascertaining whether there is a real consensus for specific changes. “
If you win the referendum …
“But we will win “.
The French system proposed by Luciano Pizzetti may be a solution?
“the proposal of the Secretary shows that the alternatives are ten, not one. Which weakens the hypothesis of any change in this phase. I hope that after the referendum there will be more peace of mind even in opposition groups, to verify the real convergence spaces. Discuss it today, after the close of Forza Italy, serves only to people who push for the no in the referendum. “
the questions will be unpacked?
” the reform as a whole has a logic and divide the questions seems to me a very artificial operation, however, the constitutional Court would have to decide, which of course we go back. “
Tuesday in the Senate you expect a warning from dell’Ncd on the local level?
“But no, the relationship with the coalition is solid and I do not see the horizon tears.”
9 July 2016 (modified July 9, 2016 | 23:16)
© ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
No comments:
Post a Comment