Wednesday, September 21, 2016

Italicum, the Chamber endorses the motion of the majority. Lacking the votes of the minority dem – The Republic

The house Chamber has adopted, with 293 votes for and 157 votes against the motion of the majority on the Italicum. Were rejected the motions submitted by the opposition. In particular, the motion of the Italian Left has earned 109 votes in favor and 287 opposed; the motion of the 5 Star Movement has got 74 votes in favour and 314 voting against; the motion of the centre-right has received 43 yes, and 315 no. A glance at the tabulated vote shows that the light in the Pd was 42, of which “18 excused absences”, while the remaining “24 absent not voted for a political choice,” explains the group leader, Ettore Rosato. Among these, include the names of Bersani, Hope, Stumpo and Cuperlo.

The yellow numbers. about the numbers, the minority dem clarifies that “The parliamentary minority are forty, and those who did not participate in the vote are 32, between not participating in the vote, and on a mission. In seven have, however, participated with a positive vote. No one has ever talked about the bond of group membership to the motion, and we find it sickening that the vertices of the group are precipitated to give you wrong numbers, in addition factious. In any case, with this vote on this motion, which we have found insufficient to reopen a job that serves the Country, this attitude confirms that instead of working to get the results you are working only to win positions as in a battle of Risk. Sin: a little bit of political intelligence in the most would not have been bad.”

The text of the motion. The text ensures the availability of the majority to “allow the various parliamentary groups to clarify their proposals, if any, of changing the electoral law currently in force, and assess the possible convergence on the proposals”.

The motion is more cautious than expected. No indication on where and how you can correct the electoral law, most times it speaks of “any” and “possible” changes. The opening is there, Renzi has confirmed from New York, but to be verified with other political forces. The president of the Mixed group Pino Pisicchio invites you to see the steps forward, albeit small: “The debate in the newspapers, he moved finally in Parliament. A law voted by the majority, with the trust now open to the contribution of the opposition”. And the minister Dario Franceschini, who was the first to open the debate in the Pd about the changes, responds to the criticism of the minority dem: “The text is so fine. The important thing is to send a signal”. But the left Pd breaks the same as the front. The bersaniani and Gianni Cuperlo, with its component “does not participate in the vote.”

Rejected the motions of the opposition. The motion of the Italian Left, rejected, asked for the change of the Italicum, in particular, of the parts considered to be at risk of unconstitutionality. The motion rejected by the Assembly, and license plate of 5 Stars repeated the “Democratellum”, that is, an electoral law with proportional correct with preferences and without a majority premium. The Room also came the motion of the Brothers of Italy, the Northern League and Forza Italia, rejected even this, which is “committed to the Chamber and its organs, each for its own competences, to change the electoral law in the very short time, immediately after the upcoming constitutional referendum”.

reactions, pre-vote minority in Pd. The minority pd met the first of the afternoon to evaluate a common attitude at the time of the vote. The former parent company Roberto Hope use the weapon of irony, to emphasize the vagueness of the motion: “the Beautiful text, no?”. Pier Luigi Bersani criticizes the move of Renzi: “First, he said that the Italicum was a perfect law, now that you can improve. You decide to do, admit he made a mistake, you open a true comparison”. And attacks: “To everything there is a limit, I want to remind you that the foxes end up in furs…”. How to say: too much cleverness can become a boomerang. The former leader of the usa the old joke of Bettino Craxi addressed to Giulio Andreotti. The other bersaniano Zoggia is the ironic: “And staniamoli these bersaniani. There is an effort fireworks display by the premier (the motion that says ‘viva la mamma’)”. The consequences of these reactions on the part of the minority is the decision not to vote for the motion. “When I read it, I stayed without words…,” says the former secretary is talking about the motion. “Just a little to understand that there is nothing – he adds -. I have asked that the government take an initiative comparable to that taken with the Italicum, when he came to the point of putting confidence, when it came to the point of remove from the committee those who did not agree. If the answer is the four words that you read in that motion, it seems to me that there is the idea of not making anything.”

the Italian Left: “the Motion embarrassing.” the Italian Left, the first force to present a motion against the Italicum as unconstitutional, considered the report of the majority of government “embarrassing”. “They are exposed to such hard luck inspect of the chairman of the Board,” says Alfredo D Attorre. The League defines as “ridiculous” the text of the Pd: “we will vote against”. It also intervenes in Matteo Salvini announcing a joint motion Forza Italia-Lega-Fratelli d’italia: “The majority takes us around,” said the secretary of the Carroccio”. Renato Brunetta speaks of “the text ridiculous and farcical”. Paul to Romans is the most simple: “it Was clear for a long time. The electoral law will start after the referendum”. In the democratic Party emerges in some doubt, even by those who will vote in favour of it. “I’ll do it for the discipline of the group, says the congressman Dario Ginefra -. I consider the motion is too generic to produce effects”. To the parent of Democracy, solidarity, Lorenzo Dellai, “the text may not be synthetic. But it serves to open the comparison in the parliament, therefore, is a positive sign.”

(collaborated Francesco Altavilla)

LikeTweet

No comments:

Post a Comment