Thursday, September 22, 2016

Renzi to the Eu: “Expenses for the earthquake and migrants outside of the constraints of the Stability, The Republic

“The flexibility was not there in the european treaties, Juncker has linked its program to the investment in flexibility, I have to say that was the word, and we have used. We respect the rules but the rules the Eu tell us that in the presence of exceptional events, you can use a different margin. If I have to be there because I have to put in place the schools I beat, but I don’t think will happen”. Matteo Renzi, Eight-and-a-half, host of Lilli Gruber together with Marco Travaglio and director of The Fact Daily, speaks at length of the story Olympics in Rome, no of the Rays, “the bitter”, but believes that “the story concluded< / strong> even if so, the M5s admit to not knowing how to change things”, but is also the president of the european Commission warns the Italian government not to overdo it with the required flexibility,< / strong> because Italy would have already exceeded 19 billion. “We – have accompanied Renzi – we are not asking for more flexibility, we’re calling for Europe to change the economic policy. The governments have signed the fiscal compact, the flexibility is the possibility to change all this”. And still the Junker: “The next year we will comply with the european rules, even those that do not agree with and that I have not voted myself, but the majority that went to silvio Berlusconi and Bersani, with responsible economic Brunette and Fassina. Are the rules for a halter to Italy, but we respect. However, the costs of immigration and seismic risk will be outside the stability Pact. I explained to Juncker on Friday morning and I think there is a european consensus”.

But the premier also spoke of many other topics, from the Italicum to the Fertility Day “unwatchable”, from the data on the work to e-mail you do not understand by Maio, of the parliamentary immunity at the date of the referendum. Between the sparks and provocations crossed.

The campaign on the fertility day is unwatchable, now, coordination between the ministries”. “Beatrice Lorenzin, you must resign as a minister after the campaign on fertility day? No, not kidding. The point is that, technically speaking, it is campaign.. But Lorenzin has placed a real theme, that of the lack of population growth. They, however, have communicated in a way that makes you raise the hair to Berlusconi”. “The point is that the danes have made a communication campaign was fantastic”, and then announces the president of the Council “I will ask all ministers if kindly, in similar occasions, it is a bit of a point of the situation and you look at the data, in short, we coordinated a little bit better”

“Mail, not all of them are Of Maio” “are Not all Di Maio, there is also those who understands the mail when the law”. Renzi launches a stilettata to the vice president of the Chamber M5s while the debate on article 70, according to Labor “written with the feet, and incomprehensible.” The prime minister referred to the episode about the email in which the vice president of the Chamber, and a member of the steering committee the M5S Luigi Di Maio was informed of the existence of an investigation borne by the councillor for the environment of Rome Paola Muraro, but of which, so he declared, he had not understood the meaning.

“Doping on the data of the work”, “Down copies of The Fact” Another call-and-response between Labor and Renzi. “On the data of the work the government has done “doping”, “non-growth” accusation of the journalist . “That which is diminished in these two years are the copies of daily Fact, not the job”, replies the premier. “I will send to you the data, is informed of this evil, even on this” asked the one, “I read always, on line. Are conducive to reading and against deforestation,” replies another. The exchange of words between the two continued: “I don’t know if I’m the Fonz I, but I ask you not to do Ralph Malph her,” joked the premier with the journalist. “By 2014, this trend was inverted on the job, because otherwise it seems that someone here has brought the stork. With Padoan, the person much more clever and wise than me, we acted. But i can’t stand maestrini with the red pen, and then I tell that I want more.”

Italicum Renzi: “If the Parliament, as it is said by all, it is available to change the Italicum we are. It strikes me a little: someone wants the “pure” proportional to the First Republic and risk the mess-ups. Available to change whatever the decision of the constitutional court”.

“the Referendum, who votes No votes on the Caste”. And about the immunity… The weather warms up again: “The constitutional reform brings 500 million euro of savings. We are removing the play of the refunds to the parties, from the Pd to the Cinquestelle. Those who vote yes removes this mechanism, those who vote no, vote the caste,” so Renzi. “If it wins the Yes you switch from bicameralism is the perfect bicameralism cazzaro”, replica Labor. “The incompetence of the constitution” of a “known constitutionalist Labor is huge”. And again: “In the article 70 of the Constitution do not understand anything, justice in italy has said that it stops teach if you pass because you do not understand.” “The well-known constitutionalist Labor has the willingness to listen to others. Are not all Di Maio…there are also those who understands the mail when the opens. The article 70 is written in detail in order to avoid that you face continual recourse to the constitutional Court. It amazes me that insofar as formal elements with respect to a theme substantial”. As for the parliamentary immunity, “there is only one Country that is trying to remove it, is the Turkey, and I think this is an error. I don’t have immunity, I have no life and even a warranty call. However, the immunity or is always true or not. When Sibilia, member of the M5s, insults the Pd, and then for it to be archived using the immunity, I say to him, ‘if you are against the immunity, waiver of immunity’. If it passes our reform and wins Yes will the parliamentarians who have it”.

“on 26 September we decide when it will vote”. Date of the referendum? asks Lilli Gruber, “we decide on the 26th, but between 27 November and 4 December is a period as possible.”

“The grillini would have had eight years of time to change”Roma “I am cheering for Italy and, unlike Labor, I think that the Games were a great opportunity for the city of Rome. I saw Barcelona and London transformed, a good administrator does not make the list of the costs of other administrations, takes and changes things. Yesterday, Los Angeles and Paris have celebrated and cried with the athletes and those that could have a return in their city. Said this respect for the mayor and we are talking about more”.

Rome and the emergency assessor waste The Capital, not the Olympics, is back in the foreground with the call-and-response Renzi-Labor at the vitriol on Paola Muraro, the councillor for waste of the Municipality of Rome. Speaking of institutional reform, the director of the Fact highlights that “the mayor can not stay in mid-service, she has made the mayor and know that you must take care of many things as emergencies waste”. Ready replication of the premier: “Not everyone will have the emergency waste, the ec has some of the councillor as a favorite of Labor,” meaning the much-discussed member of the board of Rays in the viewfinder of the power of Attorney for his expensive consultancy in the Ama. Here the journalist is heated: “I have asked for the resignation of Muraro, you think of the suspects of the Pd”. And Renzi joked: “I’m happy that Labor has discovered the magical world of the just”.

LikeTweet

No comments:

Post a Comment